Browsing by Autor "C. D. Cruz"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item type: Item , Effect of Initial Inoculum on the Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of Wheat Blast Under Field Conditions in Bolivia(American Phytopathological Society, 2024) Carlos Góngora‐Canul; Alexandria Volkening; J. A. Cuellar; Lidia Calderón; Mariela Fernández-Campos; Da-Young Lee; Jorge David Salgado; Andres Cruz-Sancan; C. D. CruzEpidemiological studies to better understand wheat blast (WB) spatial and temporal patterns were conducted in three field environments in Bolivia between 2019 and 2020. The temporal dynamics of wheat leaf blast (W<sub>L</sub>B) and spike blast (W<sub>S</sub>B) were best described by the logistic model compared with the Gompertz and exponential models. The nonlinear logistic infection rates were higher under defined inoculation in experiments two and three than under undefined inoculation in experiment one, and they were also higher for W<sub>S</sub>B than for W<sub>L</sub>B. The onset of W<sub>L</sub>B began with a spatial clustering pattern according to autocorrelation analysis and Moran's index values, with higher severity and earlier onset for defined than for undefined inoculation until the last sampling time. The W<sub>S</sub>B onset did not start with a spatial clustering pattern; instead, it was detected later until the last sampling date across experiments, with higher severity and earlier onset for defined than for undefined inoculation. Maximum severity (<i>K<sub>max</sub></i>) was 1.0 for W<sub>S</sub>B and less than 1.0 for W<sub>L</sub>B. Aggregation of W<sub>L</sub>B and W<sub>S</sub>B was higher for defined than for undefined inoculation. The directionality of hotspot development was similar for both W<sub>L</sub>B and W<sub>S</sub>B, mainly occurring concentrically for defined inoculation. Our results show no evidence of synchronized development but suggest a temporal and spatial progression of disease symptoms on wheat leaves and spikes. Thus, we recommend that monitoring and management of WB should be considered during early growth stages of wheat planted in areas of high risk.Item type: Item , Multi-environment assessment of fungicide performance for managing wheat head blast (WHB) in Brazil and Bolivia(Springer Science+Business Media, 2018) C. D. Cruz; F. M. Santana; T. C. Todd; João Leodato Nunes Maciel; Javier Kiyuna; Diego F. Baldelomar; Andrés P. Cruz; Douglas Lau; Claudine Santos Seixas; A. C. P. GoulartItem type: Item , Multiscale temporal and spatiotemporal analysis of wheat blast infection‐like dynamics using vertical plant stratification, regression and Markov chain approaches(Wiley, 2023) J. Garcia‐Peña; Joaquín Guillermo Ramírez‐Gil; Carlos Góngora‐Canul; Lidia Calderón; J. A. Cuellar; C. D. CruzAbstract The spatiotemporal progress of wheat blast (WB) epidemics within the plant canopy remains poorly known due to complex pathogen–host–environment interactions. Although deterministic methods are popular and useful, robust stochastic methods, such as generalized additive models for location, scale and shape (GAMLSS) and probability matrix or Markov transition model (MTM), have seldom been used to analyse plant disease epidemics. Hence, both methods were employed to derive valuable insights into WB epidemiology at the vertical canopy level. We conducted experiments in three climatic zones in Bolivia, using three wheat cultivars, with disease data corresponding to different canopy positions (lower, L; middle, M; flag leaf, F; and spike, S). Using WB severity data (AUDPC, progress rate and maximum severity [ K max ]), we implemented the GAMLSS and MTM to test our hypothesis that WB is affected by host resistance, location and canopy level. Results showed that the AUDPC, progress rate and K max differed across sites, cultivars and canopy positions. Clearly, L and M canopies showed a lower progress rate than F and S. The disease showed an ascending movement from L and M canopies to F and S across locations and cultivars. However, descending transitions also occurred from M to L early or F to M canopy later in the season. Both ascending and descending movements can arise at a single state or several recurrent states, indicating indirect evidence of autoinfection within the canopy before and after spike emergence. Our findings contribute knowledge to improve monitoring and managing WB.Item type: Item , Novel Sources of Wheat Head Blast Resistance in Modern Breeding Lines and Wheat Wild Relatives(American Phytopathological Society, 2019) Giovana Cruppe; C. D. Cruz; Gary L. Peterson; Kerry F. Pedley; Mohammad Asif; Allan K. Fritz; Lidia Calderón; Cristiano Lemes da Silva; Tim Todd; Paulo KuhnemWheat head blast (WHB), caused by the fungus <i>Magnaporthe oryzae</i> pathotype <i>triticum</i>, is a devastating disease affecting South America and South Asia. Despite 30 years of intensive effort, the 2N<sup>V</sup>S translocation from <i>Aegilops ventricosa</i> contains the only useful source of resistance to WHB effective against <i>M. oryzae triticum</i> isolates. The objective of this study was to identify non-2N<sup>V</sup>S sources of resistance to WHB among elite cultivars, breeding lines, landraces, and wild-relative accessions. Over 780 accessions were evaluated under field and greenhouse conditions in Bolivia, greenhouse conditions in Brazil, and at two biosafety level-3 laboratories in the United States. The <i>M. oryzae triticum</i> isolates B-71 (2012), 008 (2015), and 16MoT001 (2016) were used for controlled experiments, while isolate 008 was used for field experiments. Resistant and susceptible checks were included in all experiments. Under field conditions, susceptible spreaders were inoculated at the tillering stage to guarantee sufficient inoculum. Disease incidence and severity were evaluated as the average rating for each 1-m-row plot. Under controlled conditions, heads were inoculated after full emergence and individually rated for percentage of diseased spikelets. The diagnostic marker Ventriup-LN2 was used to test for the presence of the 2N<sup>V</sup>S translocation. Four non-2N<sup>V</sup>S spring wheat International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center breeding lines (CM22, CM49, CM52, and CM61) and four wheat wild-relatives (<i>A. tauschii</i> TA10142, TA1624, TA1667, and TA10140) were identified as resistant (<5% of severity) or moderately resistant (5 to <25% severity) to WHB. Experiments conducted at the seedling stage showed little correlation with disease severity at the head stage. <i>M. oryzae triticum</i> isolate 16MoT001 was significantly more aggressive against 2N<sup>V</sup>S-based varieties. The low frequency of WHB resistance and the increase in aggressiveness of newer <i>M. oryzae triticum</i> isolates highlight the threat that the disease poses to wheat production worldwide and the urgent need to identify and characterize new resistance genes that can be used in breeding for durably resistant varieties.