Browsing by Autor "David Venegas"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5

Appendiceal Phlegmon as an intraoperative finding: A retrospective analysis
(Research Square (United States), 2023) Danny Conde; Lina Rodríguez; David Venegas; C. Rey; Ricardo E. Núñez-Rocha; Ricardo Nassar; Marco Vanegas; Catalina Monsalve; Pablo Pinzón; Felipe Girón
Abstract Background Emergency procedures due to acute surgical abdomen correspond to a great part of emergency surgeries. Appendicitis is the most common abdominal surgical emergency in the world. Intraoperative findings can represent a challenging scenario for the surgical team and its decisions. Appendiceal phlegmon/plastron presents in 3.8-7% of patients with appendicitis and can be considered as a challenging surgical scenario where expertise may gain a fundamental value in terms of decision-making process. Therefore, we present clinical courses and outcomes of 40 patients that underwent emergency surgery with these intraoperative findings from 2016 to 2018. Methods Retrospective study with a prospective database in which we described patients with emergent need for surgical procedure due to peritoneal signs with surgical findings of appendiceal phlegmon. Multivariate analysis was performed to prove the relationship between obesity, diabetes, and surgeon experience with any complication and colonic resection. Results 40 patients underwent surgical procedure due to peritoneal signs with intraoperative findings of appendiceal phlegmon. Mean age was 51.9 (± 20.4). Procedures were performed based on intraoperative findings being appendectomy the most frequent (85%), followed by right hemicolectomy (10%) and partial cecum resection (5%). Three patients required reintervention. No mortalities were documented. Surgeries performed by junior surgeons have a higher probability to require colonic resections (P = 0.05, OR 4.05 ,95% CI), also obesity is associated with complications (P = 0.04, OR 1.44, 95% CI). Conclusion Finding of appendiceal phlegmon constitute a challenging surgical scenario in daily practice. Our patient’s complication rates are similar to those described in literature despite its emergent circumstances. Surgeons' expertise appears to be associated with outcomes. Further studies are needed to give clear recommendations.
Gastric Plication Failure: A retrospective analysis
(Research Square (United States), 2022) Ricardo Nassar; Felipe Girón; Lina Rodríguez; Carlos Eduardo Rey Cháves; David Venegas; Marco Vanegas; Danny Conde; Alberto Ricaurte; Ricardo E. Núñez-Rocha; Juan David Hernández
Abstract Background Obesity has evolved into a worldwide disease affecting millions of patients. This condition is related to a wide variety of health problems such as diabetes, hypertension, aterosclerotic disease, among others. There is a wide range of methods for managing obesity, varying from medical to surgical interventions. Even though bariatric surgery is not a one size fits all solution, since its advenment it has become an excellent option for those living with obesity. Although its low cost is very appealing, the high need of re-intervention and complications (70% according to literature) have led to controversy surrounding the use of gastric plication. The aim of this study is to describe the characteristics, experience and outcomes of patients with history of gastric fundoplication that required reintervention between 2014 and 2020 in our institution. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study with a prospective database. We included patients that developed complications from a previous gastric plication. Revision to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy was made. Data regarding baseline and evolution were obtained and analyzed. Revision cause, perioperative outcomes, intraoperative characteristics, complications and weight loss were variables included in the surgical analysis. Post-operative follow-up was done up to 5 years. Results Seventeen patients required revisional surgery. Mean age of the patients was 39.71 years, 52.9% were men and 47.1% were women. In the first consultation the main concerns were weight regain (88.2%), and abdominal pain (82.3%). 47% of the patients reported dyspepsia and 47.1% had symptoms related to nausea and emesis. Mean body mass index in the group was 31.2 kg/m² before reintervention, 27.6 kg/m² 6 months after surgery and 24.1 kg/m² 5 year after surgery. All the patients had abdominal adhesions as intraoperative findings, 41.17% had severe inflammation and 1 patient (5.8%) had a gastroesophageal fistula. Conclusions In our series, gastric plication failure was mainly associated with abdominal pain and weight regain. Revisional surgery proved to be a safe and effective alternative for management of complications after this procedure.
Intermediate Risk of Choledocholithiasis: Are we on the right path?
(Research Square (United States), 2022) Felipe Girón; Lina Rodríguez; Danny Conde; Carlos Eduardo Rey Cháves; Marco Vanegas; David Venegas; Fernando R. Gutiérrez; Ricardo Nassar; Daniel Rosselló-Jiménez; Susana Rojas
Abstract Background Risk of choledocholithiasis should be assessed in every patient who must undergo cholecystectomy to define the next step. American Society for Gastrointestinal endoscopy (ASGE) proposed a stratified predictor scale of choledocholithiasis. Methods To describe our experience managing patients with intermediate risk of choledocholithiasis according to the ASGE guidelines and actual presence of bile duct stones in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. A retrospective observational study with a prospective database was conducted. Analysis included socio demographic data, laboratory values and imaging. Bivariate, multivariate and ROC analysis was performed. Results 327 patients had intermediate risk for choledocholithiasis. Half the patients were at least 65 years old. 24.8% were diagnosed with choledocholithiasis. Bile duct dilation was documented in only 3.06% of cases. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis is associated with age OR: 1.87 (p 0.02), alkaline phosphatase OR: 2.44 (p 0.02) and bile duct dilation > 6 mm OR: 14.65 (p 0.00). Conclusions High variability in accuracy of imaging techniques results in a large number of patients classified as intermediate risk without choledocholithiasis in cholangio-resonance. Therefore, enhancing the criteria to define intermediate risk for patients in order to optimize resources is of paramount importance.
Intermediate risk of choledocholithiasis: are we on the right path?
(Wolters Kluwer, 2023) Felipe Girón; Lina Rodríguez; Danny Conde; Carlos Eduardo Rey Cháves; Marco Vanegas; David Venegas; Fernando R. Gutiérrez; Ricardo Nassar; Juan David Hernández; Daniel Jiménez
High variability in the accuracy of imaging techniques results in a large number of patients classified as intermediate risk without choledocholithiasis in cholangioresonance. Therefore, enhancing the criteria to define intermediate risk for patients in order to optimize resources is of paramount importance.
Intermediate Risk of Choledocolithiasis: Are We on the Right Path?
(Research Square (United States), 2021) Felipe Girón; Lina Rodríguez; Danny Conde; Marco Vanegas; Carlos Eduardo Rey Cháves; David Venegas; Laura Niño Torres; Fernando R. Gutiérrez; Ricardo Nassar; Daniel Rosselló-Jiménez
Abstract Background Choledocolithiasis is the presence of stones in the bile duct, commonly associated with cholelithiasis, with an incidence of 5-18%. Risk of choledocolithiasis should be assessed in every patient who must undergo cholecystectomy to define the next step, which can be either surgical or endoscopic. The American Gastroenterology Society (ASGE) proposed a predictor scale of choledocolithiasis based on ultrasound findings, liver function tests, and the presence of pancreatitis and/or cholangitis. Therefore we aim to describe our experience managing patients with intermediate risk of choledocolithiasis according to the ASGE guidelines and actual presence of bile duct stones in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Methods A retrospective observational study with a prospective database was conducted. Patients over 18 years old who complied with inclusion criteria between January and December 2019, were registered. Descriptive statistics of all study parameters were provided. Analysis included socio demographic data, laboratory values and imaging. Bivariate, multivariate and ROC analysis was performed. Results 327 patients with biliary disease were classified as having intermediate risk for choledocolithiasis. Half the patients were at least 65 years old (iqr 20). All patients underwent MRI cholangiography. 24.77% were diagnosed with choledocolithiasis. Bile duct dilation was documented in only 3.06% of cases. Diagnosis of choledocolithiasis is associated with age OR: 1.87 (p 0.02), alkaline phosphatase OR: 2.44 (p 0.02) and bile duct dilation < 6 mm OR: 14.65 (p 0.00). Conclusions There is a high proportion of patients classified as intermediate risk who did not have choledocolithiasis by colangioresonance. There is a persistently high variability in accuracy of imaging techniques in intermediate risk patients. Therefore, enhancing the criteria to define intermediate risk for patients in order to optimize resources is of paramount importance.