Browsing by Autor "Guillermo Blanco"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5

Parrots as key multilinkers in ecosystem structure and functioning
(Wiley, 2015) Guillermo Blanco; Fernando Hiraldo; Abraham Rojas; Francisco V. Dénes; José L. Tella
Mutually enhancing organisms can become reciprocal determinants of their distribution, abundance, and demography and thus influence ecosystem structure and dynamics. In addition to the prevailing view of parrots (Psittaciformes) as plant antagonists, we assessed whether they can act as plant mutualists in the dry tropical forest of the Bolivian inter-Andean valleys, an ecosystem particularly poor in vertebrate frugivores other than parrots (nine species). We hypothesised that if interactions between parrots and their food plants evolved as primarily or facultatively mutualistic, selection should have acted to maximize the strength of their interactions by increasing the amount and variety of resources and services involved in particular pairwise and community-wide interaction contexts. Food plants showed different growth habits across a wide phylogenetic spectrum, implying that parrots behave as super-generalists exploiting resources differing in phenology, type, biomass, and rewards from a high diversity of plants (113 species from 38 families). Through their feeding activities, parrots provided multiple services acting as genetic linkers, seed facilitators for secondary dispersers, and plant protectors, and therefore can be considered key mutualists with a pervasive impact on plant assemblages. The number of complementary and redundant mutualistic functions provided by parrots to each plant species was positively related to the number of different kinds of food extracted from them. These mutually enhancing interactions were reflected in species-level properties (e.g., biomass or dominance) of both partners, as a likely consequence of the temporal convergence of eco-(co)evolutionary dynamics shaping the ongoing structure and organization of the ecosystem. A full assessment of the, thus far largely overlooked, parrot-plant mutualisms and other ecological linkages could change the current perception of the role of parrots in the structure, organization, and functioning of ecosystems.
Parrots as overlooked seed dispersers
(Wiley, 2015) José L. Tella; Adrián Baños‐Villalba; Dailos Hernández‐Brito; Abraham Rojas; Erica Pacífico; José A. Díaz‐Luque; Martina Carrete; Guillermo Blanco; Fernando Hiraldo
Shortly after our friend and colleague Gary R Bortolotti passed away in 2011, his widow Heather Trueman sent JLT ten photographs of parrots that Gary had taken in Brazil. In one of these images, we saw a flying chestnut-fronted macaw (Ara severus) carrying in its beak a defleshed fruit of the motacú palm (Attalea phalerata; upper-right arrow in Figure 1); upon enlarging this picture for publication in Frontiers, we noticed another macaw transporting a smaller-sized seed (lower-left arrow in Figure 1). Gary's photograph had captured what has been described as an unusual behavior: active seed dispersal by parrots. The unexpected nature of this observation was reinforced during discussions with colleagues who specialize in avian frugivory and seed dispersal. As they argued – and contrary to well-recognized avian seed dispersers such as frugivorous passerines, trogons, and toucans, which typically swallow whole fruits and disperse seeds after gut passage – parrots handle and destroy fruits in situ to eat the pulp or to gain access to the seeds. Although more than 400 known species of parrot inhabit the world's tropical ecosystems, only lesser vasa parrots (Coracopsis nigra; Böhning-Gaese et al. 1999) and plain parakeets (Brotogeris tirica; Sazima 2008) have previously been reported to regularly disperse seeds transported in their bills. This has led to the general assumption that parrots are seed predators and thus do not participate in seed-dispersal mutualisms (Fleming and Kress 2013). Chestnut-fronted macaws (Ara severus) transporting a defleshed motacú palm fruit (Attalea phalerata; upper-right arrow) and an unidentified seed (lower-left arrow). Photo taken on 17 Oct 2009 (Rio Cristalino, Brazil). Because only two parrot species were known to routinely carry seeds in flight, this behavior is considered to be unusual. However, these two species are among the more ancestral (Coracopsis) and more modern (Brotogeris) species within the phylogenetic tree of the Psittacidae family of parrots (Wright et al. 2008), suggesting that this behavior could be well-conserved through the evolution and diversification of this large lineage of birds, but nonetheless overlooked. Parrots often forage in the canopy of tropical forests, and their foraging behaviors are difficult to study due to remote locations and logistical constraints. Thus, the likelihood of observing a parrot in flight carrying a fruit or seed in its bill may be low, and such behaviors may go largely unreported. A new photograph (Figure 2) taken by JLT, this time of a large flock of red-fronted macaws (Ara rubrogenys) in Bolivia, led us to reconsider this second hypothesis. In this case, the transport of an ear of corn (Zea mays) by a macaw went unseen until the photograph was examined more closely. We then decided to reassess the foraging behavior of parrots, searching for indications of other dispersal events. Red-fronted macaw (Ara rubrogenys) transporting an ear of corn (Zea mays). Photo taken on 27 Aug 2011 (Los Negros, Bolivia). To that end, we joined a group of parrot biologists and ecologists studying foraging behavior who, since 2012, have recorded hundreds of observations of parrots dispersing fruits or seeds using their bills or, less often, their feet (WebFigure 1). Although preliminary, our data suggest that seed dispersal by parrots is not unusual. Observations came from 28 parrot species belonging to 16 genera, ranging in body size from the smallest parakeets to the largest macaws, and involved the dispersal of fruits and seeds from 94 species of trees (including palms) and shrubs. Instances were recorded in seven countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Peru, and Spain), comprising mostly neotropical parrots but also an African and an Asian species from introduced populations of parrots in Spain. They covered a wide variety of ecosystems – from the sea-level Argentinean Pampas to high-altitude Andean forests, from continents to islands, from the wettest Amazonian savannas to the driest Caatinga forests, and from pristine to urban habitats. Regarding functional interactions, parrots –regardless of their origin – dispersed both native and non-native (including cultivated) plants. We measured the distances that fruits or seeds were carried by parrots, with the aid of laser rangefinders, in 686 dispersal events. Unsurprisingly, given the long-distance flying abilities of most parrot species, the distances spanned a wide range (maximum = 1200 m, median = 27 m, mean = 44 m; WebFigure 2). This indicates that parrots may serve as efficient long-distance seed dispersers. Moreover, we observed several incidents where transported fruits or seeds were accidentally dropped in flight or when the parrot perched during eating. Importantly, we often found uneaten, ripened seeds and seedlings growing under tree perches used by parrots, far from the nearest plant that could have provided those seeds. All of these observations point to parrots as genuine, but thus far overlooked, seed dispersers. This short story illustrates how serendipitous photographic evidence can lead scientists to question what has been considered unusual or difficult-to-observe behaviors, and highlights how much we have yet to learn about the natural history of most organisms. Given that parrots are large, colorful, and loud birds that have attracted the attention and company of humans for centuries (Tella and Hiraldo 2014), how many small yet important life-history details are we missing about numerous other, perhaps less charismatic, species? The net effect of parrots on the population dynamics of their food plants relies on the negative impact of seed predation versus the benefits for the genetic structure of tropical forests derived from long-distance seed dispersal. This contribution of parrots as antagonists and mutualists with respect to their diverse food plants warrants further research. The fact that one-third of parrot species in the world are threatened with extinction should urge the assessment of their ecological roles and the ecosystem-wide consequences of parrot population declines. Parrots may play a key role in the functioning and maintenance of biodiversity not only in tropical ecosystems but also in regions where parrots have been introduced. Gary's photograph presented us with an enlightening moment in our own research, and we hope that the preliminary data discussed here will encourage other researchers to more thoroughly explore the role of parrots in providing a key ecosystem service as seed dispersers. Gary R Bortolotti inspired us to explore this parrot behavior as well as many other aspects of avian behavior and ecology. Preliminary results on parrot seed dispersal were obtained through projects funded by Fundación Biodiversidad, Fundación Repsol, World Parrot Trust, and a Severo Ochoa award (to FH), and discussed within the ParrotNet COST Action group. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Roadside Car Surveys: Methodological Constraints and Solutions for Estimating Parrot Abundances across the World
(Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2021) José L. Tella; Pedro Romero‐Vidal; Francisco V. Dénes; Fernando Hiraldo; Bernardo Toledo; Federica Rossetto; Guillermo Blanco; Dailos Hernández‐Brito; Erica Pacífico; José A. Díaz‐Luque
Parrots stand out among birds because of their poor conservation status and the lack of available information on their population sizes and trends. Estimating parrot abundance is complicated by the high mobility, gregariousness, patchy distributions, and rarity of many species. Roadside car surveys can be useful to cover large areas and increase the probability of detecting spatially aggregated species or those occurring at very low densities. However, such surveys may be biased due to their inability to handle differences in detectability among species and habitats. We conducted 98 roadside surveys, covering > 57,000 km across 20 countries and the main world biomes, recording ca. 120,000 parrots from 137 species. We found that larger and more gregarious species are more easily visually detected and at greater distances, with variations among biomes. However, raw estimates of relative parrot abundances (individuals/km) were strongly correlated (r = 0.86–0.93) with parrot densities (individuals/km2) estimated through distance sampling (DS) models, showing that variability in abundances among species (>40 orders of magnitude) overcomes any potential detectability bias. While both methods provide similar results, DS cannot be used to study parrot communities or monitor the population trends of all parrot species as it requires a minimum of encounters that are not reached for most species (64% in our case), mainly the rarest and more threatened. However, DS may be the most suitable choice for some species-specific studies of common species. We summarize the strengths and weaknesses of both methods to guide researchers in choosing the best–fitting option for their particular research hypotheses, characteristics of the species studied, and logistical constraints.
The hidden dimension of poaching: A novel survey method shows that local demand for pets largely outnumbers domestic and international trade of neotropical parrots
(Elsevier BV, 2025) Pedro Romero‐Vidal; Abraham Rojas; Mauricio Herrera; Fernando Hiraldo; José Antonio Rodríguez Díaz; Guillermo Blanco; Martina Carrete; José L. Tella
The widespread keeping of wild pets in the Neotropics: An overlooked risk for human, livestock and wildlife health
(Wiley, 2024) Pedro Romero‐Vidal; Guillermo Blanco; Jomar M. Barbosa; Martina Carrete; Fernando Hiraldo; Erica Pacífico; Abraham Rojas; Alan Omar Bermúdez‐Cavero; José A. Díaz‐Luque; Rodrigo Raúl León Pérez
Abstract Zoonoses constitute a major risk to human health. Comprehensive assessments on the potential emergence of novel disease outbreaks are essential to ensure the effectiveness of sanitary controls and to establish mitigating actions. Through a continental‐scale survey of rural human settlements conducted over 13 years in 15 Neotropical countries, we document the vast extent of poaching to meet the local demand for pets, resulting in thousands of families living with ca. 275 species of wild animals without any sanitary controls. Parrots account for ca. 80% of wild pets, dying mostly from diseases at an average age of 1 year. This culturally rooted tradition, which dates back to pre‐Columbian times, may lead to health risks by bringing wild animals prone to carrying parasites and pathogens into close contact with humans and their exotic pets and livestock. Although animal pathogens and parasites have been transmitted to humans for centuries, the current trend of human population growth and connectivity can increase the risk of zoonotic outbreaks spreading at an unprecedented pace. Similarly, disease transmission from humans and poultry to wild animals is also expected to be facilitated via wild pets, leading to conservation problems. Several studies have highlighted the risk posed by wildlife city markets for cross‐species disease transmission, ignoring the risk associated with widespread pet ownership of wild animals poached locally in rural areas. Given its geographic and social dimensions, a holistic approach is required to reduce this illegal activity as well as to strengthen health surveillance of seized individuals and people in close contact with poached pets, which would benefit both people and wildlife. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.