Browsing by Autor "Javier Caradeux"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item type: Item , Correlation between Maternal Characteristics during Early Pregnancy, Fetal Growth Rate and Newborn Weight in Healthy Pregnancies(Karger Publishers, 2016) Javier Caradeux; Ramón Serra; Yasna Palmeiro; Paula Corrêa; Ignacio Valenzuela; Jaime Olguín; Lazaro Montenegro; Jyh Kae Nien; Eduardo Osorio; Sebastián E. IllanesMaternal first trimester BMI and UtAPI correlate with the rate of intrauterine FG and with the BW. This evidence highlights the influence of maternal first trimester variables on fetuses with normal growth and the potential role of these variables in fetal programming.Item type: Item , Performance of the Intergrowth-21st and World Health Organization fetal growth charts for the detection of small for gestational age neonates in a population from Latin America(2022) Jezid Miranda; N. Maestre; Ángel Paternina‐Caicedo; Miguel Parra‐Saavedra; Javier Caradeux; Á. Sepúlveda‐Martínez; Melisa Pelaez; Andrés Torrres; M. Parra‐Cordero; Pilar DíazObjective: To evaluate the performance of INTERGROWTH-21st and World Health Organization (WHO) fetal growth charts to identify small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) neonates as well as their specific risks for adverse neonatal outcomes. Design: Multicenter cross-sectional study. Setting: Ten maternity units across four Latin American countries, 2016-2018. Population: 67,968 singleton live births. Methods: According to each standard, the neonates were classified as SGA and FGR (birthweight <10th and <3rd centiles, respectively). Main Outcomes Measures: The relative risk (RR) and diagnostic performance for the occurrence of a low Apgar score and low ponderal index were calculated for each standard. Results: The WHO charts identified more neonates as SGA than IG-21st (13.9% vs. 7%, respectively). 6.9% babies were considered SGA only by the WHO chart. Compared to normally grown babies, neonates classified as FGRs by both standards had the highest RR for a low Apgar (RR: 5.57; 95% CI: 3.99–7.78), followed by those SGA by both curves (RR: 3.27; 95% CI: 2.52–4.24), while SGAs identified by WHO alone did not have an additional risk (RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.55–1.39). Furthermore, the diagnostic odds ratio for a low Apgar was higher when INTERGROWTH-21st was used than when SGA and FGR were defined by WHO charts. Conclusions: In a large population of singleton deliveries from Latin America, the WHO fetal growth charts seem to identify significantly more SGA neonates than the INTERGROWTH-21st charts, but the diagnostic performance of the latter for low Apgar score and low ponderal index is better.