Repository logo
Andean Publishing ↗
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Autor "Phoebe Imms"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item type: Item ,
    Increases in regional brain volume across two native South American male populations
    (Springer International Publishing, 2024) Nikhil N. Chaudhari; Phoebe Imms; Nahian F. Chowdhury; Margaret Gatz; Benjamin C. Trumble; Wendy J. Mack; Emma Law; M. Linda Sutherland; James D. Sutherland; Christopher J. Rowan
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item type: Item ,
    Physical activity mediates age differences in cognition among Tsimane forager-horticulturalists
    (Oxford University Press, 2025) Phoebe Imms; Nikhil N. Chaudhari; Daniel K. Cummings; Daniel Eid Rodríguez; Giuseppe Barisano; Paul L. Hooper; M. Katherine Sayre; Edmond Seabright; Randall C. Thompson; M. Linda Sutherland
    Among Tsimane males, who are more physically active than Tsimane females, the association between age and cognition via BV is significantly mediated by physical activity. Among Tsimane females, mediation occurs directly via physical activity, bypassing BV. These results suggest that mechanisms of cognitive differences across ages differ by sex and population. Studying the relationship between brain atrophy and lifestyle in nonindustrialized populations elucidates biological and environmental correlates of brain health.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item type: Item ,
    Segmentation and morphometry of intracranial internal carotid artery calcification in relation to brain atrophy
    (Springer Science+Business Media, 2026) Xiao Xu; Nikhil N. Chaudhari; Phoebe Imms; Nahian F. Chowdhury; Fangyun Liu; J.‐M. Galvan; Bavrina Bigjahan; Grant D. Schleifer; Maria Ashna; Blake Hannagan
    Intracranial internal carotid artery calcification (iICAC) is a form of intracranial arteriosclerosis and is associated with an elevated risk of stroke and dementia. However, iICAC’s relationship with brain atrophy remains poorly understood. We aimed to automatically quantify iICAC morphometric characteristics and evaluate their associations with regional brain volumes (BVs). We developed an automated approach to compute iICAC surface area and thickness from CT brain scans in a sample of physically active South American subsistence farmers (n = 1,232, age range: 40 years to 92 years, 48.1% female, 794 Tsimane and 438 Moseten). Linear regression models were used to assess associations between two iICAC features and regional BVs, adjusted for age, sex, population, and total intracranial volume. Significant negative relationships were found between regional BVs and iICAC surface area, but not iICAC thickness. Frontal, parietal, temporal, and subcortical BVs exhibited significant negative associations with iICAC surface area (standardized $$\beta$$ range: -0.146 to -0.066, p ≤ 0.013), while the occipital BV did not (standardized $${\beta}_{left}$$ = -0.035, p = 0.249; $${\beta}_{right}$$ = 0.007, p = 0.810). Subcortical BVs demonstrated the strongest negative associations with iICAC surface area (standardized $${\beta}_{left}$$ = -0.146, p < 0.001; $${\beta}_{right}$$ = -0.139, p < 0.001). iICAC surface area—assumed to reflect arterial stiffness—shows a stronger relationship with regional BV loss than iICAC thickness—assumed to indicate arterial stenosis. The findings suggest that brain regions primarily supplied by the anterior circulation are more vulnerable to iICAC-related atrophy. Subcortical BVs showed the strongest negative associations with iICAC surface area, with region-specific analyses identifying significant effects in the putamen, thalamus, hippocampus, amygdala, pallidum, and ventral diencephalon, suggesting heightened vulnerability of deep gray-matter structures to iICAC-related atrophy.

Andean Library © 2026 · Andean Publishing

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback