Repository logo
Andean Publishing ↗
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Autor "Sara Almeida Cruz"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item type: Item ,
    Anticoagulantes Orais Diretos versus Antagonistas da Vitamina K para Trombo Ventricular Esquerdo: Uma Metanálise com Análise Sequencial de Ensaios
    (Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC), 2024) Eric Pasqualotto; Douglas Mesadri Gewehr; Rafael Oliva Morgado Ferreira; Matheus Pedrotti Chavez; Caroliny Silva; Sara Almeida Cruz; Jhonny Limachi-Choque; Amanda Park; Mário Sérgio Soares de Azeredo Coutinho; Luiz Fernando Kubrusly
    DOACs had a similar rate of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events, as well as thrombus resolution, compared to VKAs in the treatment of LVTs. Rivaroxaban therapy had a significant reduction in thromboembolic events, compared to VKAs.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item type: Item ,
    Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists for Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis
    (Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC), 2024) Eric Pasqualotto; Douglas Mesadri Gewehr; Rafael Oliva Morgado Ferreira; Matheus Pedrotti Chavez; Caroliny Silva; Sara Almeida Cruz; Jhonny Limachi-Choque; Amanda Park; Mário Sérgio Soares de Azeredo Coutinho; Luiz Fernando Kubrusly
    Abstract Background Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are the recommended first-line treatment for left ventricular thrombus (LVT); however, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been considered an alternative therapy. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs compared with VKAs therapy in patients with LVT. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were systematically searched for randomized clinical trials or cohort studies that compared DOACs versus VKAs for LVT. Risk ratios (RRs) were computed for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Statistical significance was defined as p value < 0.05. Results A total of 4 randomized clinical trials and 29 cohort studies were included, with 4,450 patients assigned to either DOACs or VKAs. There was no significant difference between groups for stroke or systemic embolic (SSE) events (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.07; p = 0.157), stroke (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.48 to 1.11; p = 0.140), systemic embolic (SE) events (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.40 to 1.17; p = 0.166), thrombus resolution (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.11; p = 0.077), any bleeding (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.60 to 1.00; p = 0.054), clinically relevant bleeding (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.46 to 1.03; p = 0.066), minor bleeding (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.43 to 1.23; p = 0.234), major bleeding (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.42 to 1.80; p = 0.705), and all-cause mortality (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.79 to 1.39; p = 0.752). Compared with VKAs, rivaroxaban significantly reduced SSE events (RR 0.35; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.91; p = 0.029) and SE events (RR 0.39; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.95; p = 0.037). Conclusions DOACs had a similar rate of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events, as well as thrombus resolution, compared to VKAs in the treatment of LVTs. Rivaroxaban therapy had a significant reduction in thromboembolic events, compared to VKAs.

Andean Library © 2026 · Andean Publishing

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback