Browsing by Autor "Wiedensohler, Alfred"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item type: Item , Comment on acp-2020-1311(2021) Rose, Clémence; Collaud Coen, Martine; Andrews, Elisabeth; Lin, Yong; Bossert, Isaline; Lund Myhre, Cathrine; Tuch, Thomas; Wiedensohler, Alfred; Fiebig, Markus; Aalto, Pasi<strong class="journal-contentHeaderColor">Abstract.</strong> Aerosol particles are a complex component of the atmospheric system which influence climate directly by interacting with solar radiation, and indirectly by contributing to cloud formation. The variety of their sources, as well as the multiple transformations they may undergo during their transport (including wet and dry deposition), result in significant spatial and temporal variability of their properties. Documenting this variability is essential to provide a proper representation of aerosols and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) in climate models. Using measurements conducted in 2016 or 2017 at 62 ground-based stations around the world, this study provides the most up-to-date picture of the spatial distribution of particle number concentration (<span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i><sub>tot</sub></span>) and number size distribution (PNSD, from 39 sites). A sensitivity study was first performed to assess the impact of data availability on <span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i><sub>tot</sub></span>'s annual and seasonal statistics, as well as on the analysis of its diel cycle. Thresholds of 50 % and 60 % were set at the seasonal and annual scale, respectively, for the study of the corresponding statistics, and a slightly higher coverage (75 %) was required to document the diel cycle. <span id="page17187"/>Although some observations are common to a majority of sites, the variety of environments characterizing these stations made it possible to highlight contrasting findings, which, among other factors, seem to be significantly related to the level of anthropogenic influence. The concentrations measured at polar sites are the lowest (<span class="inline-formula">∼</span> 10<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span> cm<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−3</sup></span>) and show a clear seasonality, which is also visible in the shape of the PNSD, while diel cycles are in general less evident, due notably to the absence of a regular day–night cycle in some seasons. In contrast, the concentrations characteristic of urban environments are the highest (<span class="inline-formula">∼</span> 10<span class="inline-formula"><sup>3</sup></span>–10<span class="inline-formula"><sup>4</sup></span> cm<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−3</sup></span>) and do not show pronounced seasonal variations, whereas diel cycles tend to be very regular over the year at these stations. The remaining sites, including mountain and non-urban continental and coastal stations, do not exhibit as obvious common behaviour as polar and urban sites and display, on average, intermediate <span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i><sub>tot</sub></span> (<span class="inline-formula">∼</span> 10<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span>–10<span class="inline-formula"><sup>3</sup></span> cm<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−3</sup></span>). Particle concentrations measured at mountain sites, however, are generally lower compared to nearby lowland sites, and tend to exhibit somewhat more pronounced seasonal variations as a likely result of the strong impact of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) influence in connection with the topography of the sites. ABL dynamics also likely contribute to the diel cycle of <span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i><sub>tot</sub></span> observed at these stations. Based on available PNSD measurements, CCN-sized particles (considered here as either <span class="inline-formula"><i>></i>50</span> nm or <span class="inline-formula"><i>></i>100</span> nm) can represent from a few percent to almost all of <span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i><sub>tot</sub></span>, corresponding to seasonal medians on the order of <span class="inline-formula">∼</span> 10 to 1000 cm<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−3</sup></span>, with seasonal patterns and a hierarchy of the site types broadly similar to those observed for <span class="inline-formula"><i>N</i><sub>tot</sub></span>. Overall, this work illustrates the importance of in situ measurements, in particular for the study of aerosol physical properties, and thus strongly supports the development of a broad global network of near surface observatories to increase and homogenize the spatial coverage of the measurements, and guarantee as well data availability and quality. The results of this study also provide a valuable, freely available and easy to use support for model comparison and validation, with the ultimate goal of contributing to improvement of the representation of aerosol–cloud interactions in models, and, therefore, of the evaluation of the impact of aerosol particles on climate.Item type: Item , Comment on acp-2021-126(2021) Aliaga, Diego; Sinclair, Victoria A.; Andrade, Marcos; Artaxo, Paulo; Carbone, Samara; Kadantsev, Evgeny; Laj, Paolo; Wiedensohler, Alfred; Krejci, Radovan; Bianchi, Federico<strong class="journal-contentHeaderColor">Abstract.</strong> Observations of aerosol and trace gases in the remote troposphere are vital to quantify background concentrations and identify long-term trends in atmospheric composition on large spatial scales. Measurements made at high altitude are often used to study free-tropospheric air; however such high-altitude sites can be influenced by boundary layer air masses. Thus, accurate information on air mass origin and transport pathways to high-altitude sites is required. Here we present a new method, based on the source–receptor relationship (SRR) obtained from backwards WRF-FLEXPART simulations and a <span class="inline-formula"><i>k</i></span>-means clustering approach, to identify source regions of air masses arriving at measurement sites. Our method is tailored to areas of complex terrain and to stations influenced by both local and long-range sources. We have applied this method to the Chacaltaya (CHC) GAW station (5240 m a.s.l.; 16.35<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span> S, 68.13<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span> W) for the 6-month duration of the “Southern Hemisphere high-altitude experiment on particle nucleation and growth” (SALTENA) to identify where sampled air masses originate and to quantify the influence of the surface and the free troposphere. A key aspect of our method is that it is probabilistic, and for each observation time, more than one air mass (cluster) can influence the station, and the percentage influence of each air mass can be quantified. This is in contrast to binary methods, which label each observation time as influenced by either boundary layer or free-troposphere air masses. Air sampled at CHC is a mix of different provenance. We find that on average 9 % of the air, at any given observation time, has been in contact with the surface within 4 d prior to arriving at CHC. Furthermore, 24 % of the air has been located within the first 1.5 km above ground level (surface included). Consequently, 76 % of the air sampled at CHC originates from the free troposphere. However, pure free-tropospheric influences are rare, and often samples are concurrently influenced by both boundary layer and free-tropospheric air masses. A clear diurnal cycle is present, with very few air masses that have been in contact with the surface being detected at night. The 6-month analysis also shows that the most dominant air mass (cluster) originates in the Amazon and is responsible for 29 % of the sampled air. Furthermore, short-range clusters<span id="page16454"/> (origins within 100 km of CHC) have high temporal frequency modulated by local meteorology driven by the diurnal cycle, whereas the mid- and long-range clusters' (<span class="inline-formula">>200</span> km) variability occurs on timescales governed by synoptic-scale dynamics. To verify the reliability of our method, in situ sulfate observations from CHC are combined with the SRR clusters to correctly identify the (pre-known) source of the sulfate: the Sabancaya volcano located 400 km north-west from the station.