Browsing by Autor "Zahra Feiz"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

Equal Status of Fathers and Grandfathers as Guardians
(2016) Hamid Masjed Saraei; Rasoul Mousavi; Zahra Feiz
In light of Islamic Jurisprudence and Iranian legal system, fathers and grandfathers have been recognized as natural guardians and both enjoy an equal status. However, if father and grandfather are simultaneously engaged in this legal act, conflict is likely to occur. to resolve this conflict, Islamic jurists have suggested various theories. Some have given the priority to the grandfather and some assigned the priority to the father. Careful study of the opinions of these two groups indicates that neither of these positions is acceptable, and assigning priority to father or grandfather is determined by some factors. The present articles deals with a number of conditions and factors which should be taken into account in resolving the conflict.
Nafy-e-Sabil Rule (Non-Dependency Rule) and the Accession of Iran to the International Convention on the Suppression of Financing Terrorism
(2019) Siamak Karamzadeh; Zahra Feiz
Maintenance of independency and honor of the Muslim state in international relationships, obligations and relations is one of the requirements of Nafy-e-Sabil Rule (Non-Dependency Rule); a jurisprudential rule which in accordance with logical and traditional proofs is based on the principle of negation of ascendency of non-Muslims over Muslims. It predicates the legal acceptance of relation with other states and conclusion of any contract or treaty to non-domination of aliens over Muslim countries. Giving the necessity of the economic development of the country and its implication to the principle of negation of submissiveness, the issue of accession of Iran to the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) as an example of international treaties, is dealt with in this research. Although according to most of the Islamic jurists this principle is applied as a primary rule and negates any sort of submissiveness even in international contracts, this study has reached to a conclusion based on which in case of conflict of the rule with more important interests, the principle is allocable; specifically in international relations that is the sphere of reason and rationality where the expedient reason should take into account the interests and goods of the country and its possible defects and advance on its basis. The authority to determine the interest or defect is the organization or the institution responsible for signing the contract.
Principles Governing a Fair Trial under Islamic Jurisprudence and International Law
(International journal of multicultural and multireligious understanding, 2021) Amin Karamzadeh; Zahra Feiz
A fair trial along with the preservation of human dignity is one of the most important features of Islamic judicial measurement and is a guarantee for individuals to enjoy the fundamental principles of human rights such as freedom and equality. The administration of judicial justice is not only possible due to the existence of substantive laws, but also its executive and formal methods have a prominent and important role in this field, which is also understood by the international judicial system today. However, the weakness of human thought in formulating comprehensive and efficient laws prevents the realization of justice and the achievement of a fair trial. The present article - with a descriptive-analytical method - deals with the formal and principled laws in a fair trial from the perspective of the Islamic judicial system and concludes that the Islamic judicial system includes principles that guarantee the rights of the accused to the highest degree and observe and include this Formal principles and rules in law are a step towards establishing justice in judicial proceedings; However, these laws have been approved and emphasized much earlier than other systems along with the preservation of human dignity in the Islamic judiciary.