Sex Equality

dc.contributor.authorIsabel Cristina Jaramillo Sierra
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T20:30:53Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T20:30:53Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractAbstract The last twenty years or so have witnessed crucial innovations in Latin America regarding constitutional design: from Argentina’s constitutionalizing of international law in 1994 to Ecuador and Bolivia’s consecration of good living as a constitutional principle. However, sex discrimination, as an argument, has just started to take root in legal mobilization and adjudication throughout the region. This chapter maps out these interventions to highlight the building blocks for the feminist constitutionalism to come, while acknowledging that constitutions have been hostile environments for women and that there have been good reasons for women to stay away. It starts by providing an account of how sex equality is mandated in the text of Latin American constitutions. It then describes the ways in which Courts have used sex equality in cases involving constitutional decisions. Finally, it describes three strategies used by feminist organizations to harness the power of constitutions to better the lives of women.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198786900.013.50
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198786900.013.50
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/82444
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.ispartofOxford University Press eBooks
dc.sourceUniversidad de Los Andes
dc.subjectConstitutionalism
dc.subjectConsecration
dc.subjectArgument (complex analysis)
dc.subjectLatin Americans
dc.subjectAdjudication
dc.subjectPower (physics)
dc.subjectPolitical science
dc.subjectLaw
dc.subjectSociology
dc.subjectGender studies
dc.titleSex Equality
dc.typebook-chapter

Files