The Expansion of Public Spending and Mass Education in Bolivia: Did the 1952 Revolution Represent a Permanent Shock?

dc.contributor.authorJosé Peres‐Cajías
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T20:08:11Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T20:08:11Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 20
dc.description.abstractThis chapter aims at analyzing whether educational spending in Bolivia fits well into the regional description or, by contrast, changed radically and took distance from the Latin American pattern after the 1952 Revolution. Taking advantage of new quantitative evidence, the chapter stresses that the Revolution did not imply, in the long term, a substantial modification of the quality and redistributive character of the Bolivian education system. Four main findings support this claim: public spending in education was hardly sustainable over time; education spending, controlled by pc GDP, was not outstanding by international standards; the inexistence of a substantial support to primary education may have reduced the redistributive impact of education spending; and education outputs, either in quantity or quality terms, were often among the worse in the region.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-319-44621-9_9
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44621-9_9
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/80198
dc.language.isoen
dc.sourceUniversidad Católica Bolivia San Pablo
dc.subjectShock (circulatory)
dc.subjectLatin Americans
dc.subjectPublic spending
dc.subjectMass education
dc.subjectShock therapy
dc.subjectPublic education
dc.subjectEconomics
dc.subjectQuality (philosophy)
dc.subjectDevelopment economics
dc.subjectPolitical science
dc.titleThe Expansion of Public Spending and Mass Education in Bolivia: Did the 1952 Revolution Represent a Permanent Shock?
dc.typebook-chapter

Files