Ana Laísa Andrada OliveiraMaria Eduarda Pereira de OliveiraLucas Veiga GuimarãesGabrielly Machado TrindadeGuilherme Martins ChavesAndreia Cristina Pernas GonçalvesTalita Jaine Franchini de SouzaLetícia Santos MoraesVictória Soares Coelho LujanLívia Silva de Paula Faria2026-03-222026-03-22202210.1111/echo.15486https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.15486https://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/85610Citaciones: 13Right ventricle GLS can be considered for routine follow-up of TOF repair patients, even though CMR remains the noninvasive gold standard method. Using a single parameter may not allow comparison of the accuracy of 3D RV EF by using CMR and GLS. Further studies with a larger number of patients undergoing TOF repair are required to evaluate the correlation between these examinations.enTetralogy of FallotCardiologyMedicineCardiac magnetic resonanceInternal medicineVentricleEjection fractionGold standard (test)Pulmonary Valve InsufficiencyCardiac magnetic resonance imagingreview