Yvan Noel Córdova Castilo2026-03-242026-03-24202510.71068/edwkbv58https://doi.org/10.71068/edwkbv58https://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/99786This article critically examines the legal issues surrounding the revocability of alternative sanctions established in Law No. 348 (Comprehensive Law to Guarantee Women a Life Free of Violence) in Bolivia. Through an exhaustive analysis of the regulatory, jurisprudential, and doctrinal framework, there is a concerning normative ambiguity that has generated divergent interpretations regarding the possibility of revoking these sanctions in case of non-compliance. The study revealed that only Article 77, referring to the alternative sanction of fines, explicitly contemplates revocability, while in other cases (weekend detention, community service, security measures, and disqualification), there is a regulatory gap that weakens the effective protection of victims. This situation has contributed to the perception of impunity, undermining the effectiveness of Law No. 348 as a tool to eradicate violence against women, which is reflected in the alarming rates of femicides that persist in the country. A regulatory reform is proposed that explicitly incorporates revocability in all articles establishing alternative sanctions, thus strengthening the coherence of the Bolivian legal system and ensuring better protection for women victims of violence.SanctionsNormativeAmbiguityCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)PerceptionContext (archaeology)Legitimacyarticle