Ana María Andaluz Romanillos2026-03-222026-03-22201510.5281/zenodo.33906https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.33906https://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/52621Citaciones: 2This paper tries to articulate the <em>Critique of Judgement</em> within the contemporary debate on the issues of determinism and freedom. From this perspective, it sustains, against Habermas’s ideas, that the duality between the two worlds did not prevent Kant to lay the foundations of a coherent vision of the world which included man as a natural being. The paper is structured in two parts. The first is dedicated to the study of Habermas’s proposal of combining an epistemological dualism with a non-scientific naturalist monism (weak naturalism), as a suitable channel for a coherent picture of the world. The second part is dedicated to Kant. It emphasises that the <em>Critique of Judgement</em>, through a perception of nature and the place of man in it, ensued as a biological organism, achieves, from a thoughtful judgement, an image of man as a natural being in harmony with freedom. We, therefore, may characterize Kant’s proposal as a harmony in duality.enPhilosophyHumanitiesarticle