Rosmery Sabina Pozo EncisoOscar Arbieto MamaniMiguel Gerardo Mendoza Vargas2026-03-222026-03-22202210.5281/zenodo.7149889https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7149889https://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/84792Objective: To identify and describe the stages of moral judgement in university students in the tenth cycle of Ica.<br> Method: The research methodology was descriptive-observational, quantitative and cross-sectional. The population consisted of university students in the tenth cycle and the sample consisted of 157 university students. A survey was used as a data collection tool and a questionnaire was used to measure the stages of moral judgement according to Lawrence Kholberg. <br> Results: It was concluded that 12.75% of the study sample was in the instructional relativism stage, 23.10% were in interpersonal agreement, 35.76% were in social order and authority, 11.95% were in social contract and finally 3.80% were in universal ethical principles.<br> Conclusion: Concluding and identifying that the stages of moral judgement among the study sample indicate that interpersonal agreement, social order and authority are the most developed among university students.enLawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral developmentJudgementPerspective (graphical)PsychologySocial psychologyEpistemologyCognitive psychologyMoral reasoningdataset