Patrick BottazziVictòria Reyes-GarcíaDavid CrespoSarah-Lan Marthez-StiefelHarry Soria GalvarroJohanna JacobiMarcelo ClavijoStephan Rist2026-03-222026-03-22201310.1080/21683565.2013.841606https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2013.841606https://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/47711Citaciones: 13Agricultural and forest productive diversification depends on multiple socioeconomic drivers—like knowledge, migration, productive capacity, and market—that shape productive strategies and influence their ecological impacts. Our comparison of indigenous and settlers allows a better understanding of how societies develop different diversification strategies in similar ecological contexts and how the related socioeconomic aspects of diversification are associated with land cover change. Our results suggest that although indigenous people cause less deforestation and diversify more, diversification is not a direct driver of deforestation reduction. A multidimensional approach linking sociocognitive, economic, and ecological patterns of diversification helps explain this contradiction.enDiversification (marketing strategy)IndigenousDeforestation (computer science)Amazon rainforestGeographyAgricultureContradictionEcologySocioeconomic statusNatural resource economicsarticle