Effects of bioenergy on biodiversity arising from land-use change and crop type.

dc.contributor.authorNúñez-Regueiro, Mauricio M
dc.contributor.authorSiddiqui, Sharmin F
dc.contributor.authorFletcher, Robert J
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-24T15:04:45Z
dc.date.available2026-03-24T15:04:45Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionVol. 35, No. 1, pp. 77-87
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding how the world's flora and fauna will respond to bioenergy expansion is critical. This issue is particularly pronounced considering bioenergy's potential role as a driver of land-use change, the variety of production crops being considered and currently used for biomass, and the diversity of ecosystems that can potentially supply land for bioenergy across the planet. We conducted 2 global meta-analyses to determine how 8 of the most commonly used bioenergy crops may affect site-level biodiversity. One search was directed at finding data on biodiversity in different production land uses and the other at extracting energy-yield estimates of potential bioenergy crops. We used linear mixed-effect models to test whether effects on biodiversity varied with different individual bioenergy crop species, estimated energy yield, first- or second-generation crops, type of reference ecosystem considered, and magnitude of vertical change in habitat structure between any given crop and the reference ecosystem. Species diversity and abundance were generally lower in crops considered for bioenergy relative to the natural ecosystems they may replace. First-generation crops, derived from oils, sugars, and starches, tended to have greater effects than second-generation crops, derived from lignocellulose, woody crops, or residues. Crop yield had nonlinear effects on abundance and, to a lesser extent, overall biodiversity; biodiversity effects were driven by negative yield effects for birds but not other taxa. Our results emphasize that replacing natural ecosystems with bioenergy crops across the planet will largely be detrimental for biodiversity, with first generation and high-yield crops having the strongest negative effects. We argue that meeting energy goals with bioenergy using existing marginal lands or biomass extraction within existing production landscapes may provide more biodiversity-friendly alternatives than conversion of natural ecosystems for biofuel production.eng
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, U.S.A. | Instituto de Bio y Geociencias del NOA, Universidad Nacional de Salta, Laboratorio de Ecologia Aplicada, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Avenida Bolivia 5150, Salta, 4400, Argentina. | Universidad Católica de Salta. Campo Castañares S/N, Salta, 4400, Argentina.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cobi.13452
dc.identifier.issn1523-1739
dc.identifier.otherPMID:31854480
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13452
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/101075
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
dc.sourcePubMed
dc.subjectamphibians
dc.subjectanfibios
dc.subjectaves
dc.subjectbiocombustibles
dc.subjectbiodiversidad
dc.subjectbiodiversity
dc.subjectbiofuels
dc.subjectbirds
dc.subjectcrops
dc.subjectcultivos
dc.subjectdeforestación
dc.subjectdeforestation
dc.subjectforest
dc.subjectgrassland
dc.subjectmammals
dc.subjectmamíferos
dc.subjectpastizales
dc.subjectplantas
dc.subjectplants
dc.subjectreptiles
dc.subject两栖动物
dc.subject农作物
dc.subject哺乳动物
dc.subject森林
dc.subject森林砍伐
dc.subject植物
dc.subject爬行动物
dc.subject生物多样性
dc.subject生物燃料
dc.subject草原
dc.subject鸟类
dc.titleEffects of bioenergy on biodiversity arising from land-use change and crop type.
dc.typeArtículo Científico Publicado

Files