Current Status of Three-Dimensional Laparoscopy in Urology: An ESUT Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis
| dc.contributor.author | Riccardo Bertolo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Enrico Checcucci | |
| dc.contributor.author | Daniele Amparore | |
| dc.contributor.author | Riccardo Autorino | |
| dc.contributor.author | Alberto Breda | |
| dc.contributor.author | M. Backhaus | |
| dc.contributor.author | Prokar Dasgupta | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cristian Fiori | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jens Rassweiler | |
| dc.contributor.author | Evangelos Liatsikos | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Bolivia | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-22T21:04:39Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-22T21:04:39Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.description | Citaciones: 14 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The present systematic review and cumulative-analysis indicated that 3D laparoscopy could offer some advantages in terms of operative time for more challenging procedures requiring intracorporeal suture. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1089/end.2018.0374 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0374 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/85792 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Endourology | |
| dc.source | Ohio Gastroenterology and Liver Institute | |
| dc.subject | Medicine | |
| dc.subject | Meta-analysis | |
| dc.subject | Jadad scale | |
| dc.subject | Confidence interval | |
| dc.subject | Laparoscopy | |
| dc.subject | MEDLINE | |
| dc.subject | Perioperative | |
| dc.subject | Prostatectomy | |
| dc.subject | Odds ratio | |
| dc.subject | Publication bias | |
| dc.title | Current Status of Three-Dimensional Laparoscopy in Urology: An ESUT Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis | |
| dc.type | review |