Understanding contradictory styles of policing

dc.contributor.authorFernando León Tamayo Arboleda
dc.contributor.authorMariana Valverde
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T14:58:09Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T14:58:09Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 3
dc.description.abstractPolicing scholars have shown that logics of police governance that appear mutually exclusive can coexist in the same space and time. Within police institutions, we can find more military-like mindsets alongside democratic rationalities. We here present a novel theoretical perspective for understanding such coexistence. Instead of attempting to identify police rationalities by reference to organizational/structural factors such as subcultures, training, or firearms and other equipment, we show that contradictory logics of policing can coexist within the same force by differentiating policing's targets by space, temporality, and identity. To do so, we use the idea of “chronotope” to identify and understand how police officers decide between conflicting rationalities of policing.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/13624806231196564
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/13624806231196564
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/49613
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofTheoretical Criminology
dc.sourceUniversidad de Los Andes
dc.subjectTemporality
dc.subjectChronotope
dc.subjectPerspective (graphical)
dc.subjectCorporate governance
dc.subjectSociology
dc.subjectSpace (punctuation)
dc.subjectCriminology
dc.subjectGovernmentality
dc.subjectIdentity (music)
dc.subjectPolitics
dc.titleUnderstanding contradictory styles of policing
dc.typearticle

Files