Evaluating the Potential of Ursolic Acid as Bioproduct for Cutaneous and Visceral Leishmaniasis.

dc.contributor.authorBilbao-Ramos, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorSerrano, Dolores R
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Saldaña, Helga Karina
dc.contributor.authorTorrado, Juan J
dc.contributor.authorBolás-Fernández, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorDea-Ayuela, María Auxiliadora
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-24T15:04:39Z
dc.date.available2026-03-24T15:04:39Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.descriptionVol. 25, No. 6
dc.description.abstractLeishmaniasis affects around 12 million people worldwide and is estimated to cause the ninth-largest disease burden. There are three main forms of the disease, visceral (VL), cutaneous (CL), and mucocutaneous (MCL), leading to more than one million new cases every year and several thousand deaths. Current treatments based on chemically synthesized molecules are far from ideal. In this study, we have tested the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of ursolic acid (UA), a multifunctional triterpenoid with well-known antitumoral, antioxidant, and antimicrobial effects on different Leishmania strains. The in vitro antileishmanial activity against the intracellular forms was six and three-fold higher compared to extracellular forms of L. amazonensis and L. infantum, respectively. UA also showed to be a potent antileishmanial drug against both VL and CL manifestations of the disease in experimental models. UA parenterally administered at 5 mg/kg for seven days significantly reduced the parasite burden in liver and spleen not only in murine acute infection but also in a chronic-infection model against L. infantum. In addition, UA ointment (0.2%) topically administered for four weeks diminished (50%) lesion size progression in a chronic infection model of CL caused by L. amazonensis, which was much greater than the effect of UA formulated as an O/W emulsion. UA played a key role in the immunological response modulating the Th1 response. The exposure of Leishmania-infected macrophages to UA led to a significant different production in the cytokine levels depending on the Leishmania strain causing the infection. In conclusion, UA can be a promising therapy against both CL and VL.eng
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartament of Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Pharmacy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Plaza Ramón y Cajal s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain. | Laboratorio de Parasitología y Entomología INLASA, Pasaje Rafael Zubieta #1889, (Lado Estado Mayor del ejército) Zona Miraflores, La Paz, Bolivia. | Departament of Pharmaceutics and Food Technology, School of Pharmacy, University Complutense, Avenida Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/molecules25061394
dc.identifier.issn1420-3049
dc.identifier.otherPMID:32204358
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25061394
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/101065
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)
dc.sourcePubMed
dc.subjectacute-infection
dc.subjectchronic-infection
dc.subjectcutaneous leishmaniasis
dc.subjectcytokines
dc.subjectursolic acid
dc.subjectvisceral leishmaniasis
dc.titleEvaluating the Potential of Ursolic Acid as Bioproduct for Cutaneous and Visceral Leishmaniasis.
dc.typeArtículo Científico Publicado

Files