Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Latin American Adult Intensive Care Units: PROA-LATAM Project

dc.contributor.authorRodolfo Quirós
dc.contributor.authorPatricia Angeleri
dc.contributor.authorJeannete Zurita
dc.contributor.authorWashington Alemán
dc.contributor.authorMarcelo Carneiro
dc.contributor.authorS Del Guerra
dc.contributor.authorJulio C. Medina
dc.contributor.authorXimena Castañda Luquerna
dc.contributor.authorAlexander Guerra
dc.contributor.authorSilvio Vega
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T15:13:49Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T15:13:49Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 4
dc.description.abstractBackground: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are useful in improving clinical outcomes in a cost-effective way and in reducing antimicrobial resistance. Objective: We sought to determine the impact of ASP in adult medical-surgical intensive care units (MS-ICUs). Methods: A multicenter study, in 77 MS-ICUs of 9 Latin-American countries, was conducted along 12 months (July 2018–June 2019). A self-assessment survey using a tool based on CDC recommendations (0–100 scale) was performed at the beginning, after 6 months, and at the end of the study. The impact of ASP was evaluated monthly using the following indicators: antimicrobial consumption (defined daily doses [DDD] per 100 patient days), appropriateness of antimicrobial prescriptions (percentage of total prescriptions), crude mortality rate (events per 100 discharges), and hospital-acquired multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDRs) and Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI events per 1,000 patient days). These indicators were compared between MS-ICUs that reached the 75th percentile and those that maintained the 25th percentile at the final self-assessment. Results: Of all indicators evaluated, only surgical prophylaxis ≤24 hours, vancomycin therapeutic monitoring, and aminoglycosides (1 dose per day) did not show significant differences between MS-ICUs at the 75th percentile and the 25th percentile. CDI events were significantly higher at the 75th percentile MS-ICUs, probably related to better detection of C. difficile (Table 1). Conclusions: This study confirmed that MS-ICUs with more comprehensive ASPs had significantly better indicators. Funding: Proprietary Organization: MERCK Disclosures: None
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/ice.2020.1203
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2020.1203
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/51145
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCambridge University Press
dc.relation.ispartofInfection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
dc.sourceMinisterio de Salud
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectAntimicrobial stewardship
dc.subjectPercentile
dc.subjectMedical prescription
dc.subjectIntensive care
dc.subjectEmergency medicine
dc.subjectClostridioides
dc.subjectIntensive care medicine
dc.titleImpact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Latin American Adult Intensive Care Units: PROA-LATAM Project
dc.typearticle

Files