The role of forest conversion, degradation, and disturbance in the carbon dynamics of Amazon indigenous territories and protected areas

dc.contributor.authorWayne Walker
dc.contributor.authorSeth R. Gorelik
dc.contributor.authorAlessandro Baccini
dc.contributor.authorJosé Aragón-Osejo
dc.contributor.authorCarmen Josse
dc.contributor.authorChris Meyer
dc.contributor.authorMárcia N. Macedo
dc.contributor.authorCicero Augusto
dc.contributor.authorSandra Ríos
dc.contributor.authorTuntiak Katan
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T13:50:48Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T13:50:48Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 318
dc.description.abstractMaintaining the abundance of carbon stored aboveground in Amazon forests is central to any comprehensive climate stabilization strategy. Growing evidence points to indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLCs) as buffers against large-scale carbon emissions across a nine-nation network of indigenous territories (ITs) and protected natural areas (PNAs). Previous studies have demonstrated a link between indigenous land management and avoided deforestation, yet few have accounted for forest degradation and natural disturbances-processes that occur without forest clearing but are increasingly important drivers of biomass loss. Here we provide a comprehensive accounting of aboveground carbon dynamics inside and outside Amazon protected lands. Using published data on changes in aboveground carbon density and forest cover, we track gains and losses in carbon density from forest conversion and degradation/disturbance. We find that ITs and PNAs stored more than one-half (58%; 41,991 MtC) of the region's carbon in 2016 but were responsible for just 10% (-130 MtC) of the net change (-1,290 MtC). Nevertheless, nearly one-half billion tons of carbon were lost from both ITs and PNAs (-434 MtC and -423 MtC, respectively), with degradation/disturbance accounting for >75% of the losses in 7 countries. With deforestation increasing, and degradation/disturbance a neglected but significant source of region-wide emissions (47%), our results suggest that sustained support for IPLC stewardship of Amazon forests is critical. IPLCs provide a global environmental service that merits increased political protection and financial support, particularly if Amazon Basin countries are to achieve their commitments under the Paris Climate Agreement.
dc.identifier.doi10.1073/pnas.1913321117
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1913321117
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/43061
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherNational Academy of Sciences
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
dc.sourceWoodwell Climate Research Center
dc.subjectAmazon rainforest
dc.subjectDeforestation (computer science)
dc.subjectDisturbance (geology)
dc.subjectEnvironmental science
dc.subjectBiomass (ecology)
dc.subjectClearing
dc.subjectReducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation
dc.subjectCarbon fibers
dc.subjectAgroforestry
dc.subjectClimate change
dc.titleThe role of forest conversion, degradation, and disturbance in the carbon dynamics of Amazon indigenous territories and protected areas
dc.typearticle

Files