Methodological and Cognitive Biases in Science: Issues for Current Research and Ways to Counteract Them
| dc.contributor.author | Manuela Fernández Pinto | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Bolivia | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-22T14:19:56Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-22T14:19:56Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.description | Citaciones: 13 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Arguments discrediting the value-free ideal of science have left us with the question of how to distinguish desirable values from biases that compromise the reliability of research. In this paper, I argue for a characterization of cognitive biases as deviations of thought processes that systematically lead scientists to the wrong conclusions. In particular, cognitive biases could help us understand a crucial issue in science today: how systematic error is introduced in research outcomes, even when research is evaluated as of good quality. To conclude, I suggest that some debiasing mechanisms have great potential for countering implicit methodological biases in science. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1162/posc_a_00589 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00589 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/45893 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | The MIT Press | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Perspectives on Science | |
| dc.source | Universidad de Los Andes | |
| dc.subject | Debiasing | |
| dc.subject | Compromise | |
| dc.subject | Cognitive bias | |
| dc.subject | Quality (philosophy) | |
| dc.subject | Cognition | |
| dc.subject | Psychology | |
| dc.subject | Ideal (ethics) | |
| dc.subject | Value (mathematics) | |
| dc.subject | Reliability (semiconductor) | |
| dc.subject | Epistemology | |
| dc.title | Methodological and Cognitive Biases in Science: Issues for Current Research and Ways to Counteract Them | |
| dc.type | article |