Evaluating essential health packages from a human rights perspective

dc.contributor.authorAudrey R. Chapman
dc.contributor.authorLisa Forman
dc.contributor.authorEveraldo Lamprea
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T14:18:11Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T14:18:11Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 16
dc.description.abstractMany countries at all levels of development have formulated an essential health package, sometimes also referred to as a health benefit plan or a health benefit basket. As defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), essential health packages (EHPs) are “health service interventions that are considered important and that society decides should be provided to everyone.” Although EHPs are not often formulated from an explicitly human rights perspective, since they are conceptualized as a guaranteed minimum of health services, much like core health obligations, they have obvious human rights import. This article evaluates the principles from which the plans are developed, the content of the packages, and the experience of countries seeking to implement them from a human rights perspective. In the process, it seeks to gain greater clarity about the health service requirements of the right to health.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14754835.2015.1107828
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2015.1107828
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/45722
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Human Rights
dc.sourceUniversity of Toronto
dc.subjectPerspective (graphical)
dc.subjectHuman rights
dc.subjectHuman health
dc.subjectEngineering ethics
dc.subjectPolitical science
dc.subjectEnvironmental ethics
dc.subjectEpistemology
dc.subjectSociology
dc.titleEvaluating essential health packages from a human rights perspective
dc.typearticle

Files