A comparative assessment of laser interstitial thermal therapy and open resective surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy: a meta-analysis of 3873 patients

dc.contributor.authorDiego Pichardo‐Rojas
dc.contributor.authorCésar Bigran Espinosa-Cantú
dc.contributor.authorAlder Fernando Valenzuela‐Rangel
dc.contributor.authorLuz Camila Choque-Ayala
dc.contributor.authorAldo Barrón‐Lomelí
dc.contributor.authorErnesto A. Gutierrez-Herrera
dc.contributor.authorSonia Iliana Mejía‐Pérez
dc.contributor.authorPavel S. Pichardo‐Rojas
dc.contributor.authorVanessa Milanese
dc.contributor.authorLeonardo Rangel-Castilla
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T14:01:06Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T14:01:06Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 2
dc.description.abstractAcross unmatched studies evaluating focal DRE, ORS showed a higher rate of SF. However, pooled matched-cohort analyses showed no difference between interventions in achieving SF, a trend also noted in the authors' PSM TLE sample. LITT, however, offered significantly shorter LHS and lower CRs. Future prospective studies should match patient populations to control for confounding factors and assess key outcomes, such as postoperative neurocognitive follow-up and quality of life measurements, in order to fully evaluate the risks and benefits of each approach.
dc.identifier.doi10.3171/2025.4.jns25386
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3171/2025.4.jns25386
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/44060
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Association of Neurological Surgeons
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of neurosurgery
dc.sourceSchool for Advanced Research
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.subjectConfounding
dc.subjectProspective cohort study
dc.subjectQuality of life (healthcare)
dc.subjectMeta-analysis
dc.subjectNeurocognitive
dc.subjectPsychological intervention
dc.subjectMEDLINE
dc.subjectSignificant difference
dc.titleA comparative assessment of laser interstitial thermal therapy and open resective surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy: a meta-analysis of 3873 patients
dc.typearticle

Files