Estrés percibido según tipo de aislamiento durante la COVID-19 en Suramérica, 2020. Perceived stress by type of isolation during COVID-19 in South America, 2020
| dc.contributor.author | Joan Chipia Lobo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sergio Bravo-Cucci | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rodrigo Nuñez-Cortez | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sandra Lobo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mariana Sánchez | |
| dc.contributor.author | José Jairo Narrea Vargas | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Bolivia | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-22T18:36:54Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-22T18:36:54Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The research raised one of the mental health implications during COVID-19, specifically in terms of stress, therefore the objective was to compare perceived stress according to type of isolation during COVID-19 in South America, 2020. Method: quantitative approach, comparative type, non-experimental, cross-sectional, multicenter design. The sample consisted of people over 18 years of age who are in social isolation due to COVID-19 in South America, who wanted to participate in the study and correctly completed the form (n = 16,811). Data collection was carried out through a Google Form and the Perceived Stress Scale (EPP-10) was used. Results: 87% female, the age was between 18 and 79 years, 30.76 ± 11.82 years. The type of isolation indicated was mostly voluntary (50.5%). In general, in the EPP-10, a mean and standard deviation of 20.61 ± 6.105 were determined, with the highest percentages being 44.0% in the middle level and 46.1% in the middle-high level. It was obtained that there are statistically significant differences (p <0.001) in the PPE-10 according to type of isolation, finding that the subjects with mandatory isolation showed a higher mean and standard deviation (21.25 ± 5.945), followed by restricted (20, 79 ± 6.051) and finally voluntary (20.04 ± 6.191). Conclusions: the perceived stress for the subjects and study period was found in a higher percentage in the medium and medium-high levels, in addition the type of isolation, number of people with whom they live and knowing a family member with the disease influenced the level of stress perceived. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/71162 | |
| dc.language.iso | es | |
| dc.source | Universidad de Los Andes | |
| dc.subject | Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) | |
| dc.subject | Social isolation | |
| dc.subject | Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) | |
| dc.subject | Isolation (microbiology) | |
| dc.subject | 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak | |
| dc.subject | Demography | |
| dc.subject | Cross-sectional study | |
| dc.subject | Medicine | |
| dc.subject | Psychology | |
| dc.title | Estrés percibido según tipo de aislamiento durante la COVID-19 en Suramérica, 2020. Perceived stress by type of isolation during COVID-19 in South America, 2020 | |
| dc.type | article |