Reducing Moral Disengagement Mechanisms: A Comparison of Two Interventions

dc.contributor.authorAndrea Bustamante
dc.contributor.authorEnrique Chaux
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T14:05:54Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T14:05:54Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 57
dc.description.abstractTwo intervention strategies aimed at stopping moral disengagement in adolescents were evaluated with 116 ninth-grade students (M age = 14.6 years). Three classrooms were randomly assigned to three conditions: intervention based on critical thinking and social regulation, intervention based on persuasion and behavioral journalism, and a control group. Results revealed a significant reduction in moral justifications and in moral disengagement related to stealing among participants in the critical thinking and social regulation intervention in comparison to the control group and the behavioral journalism intervention group. Given the few interventions aimed at stopping moral disengagement, this study is an important contribution that suggests that it is possible to reduce moral disengagement with school-based pedagogical interventions.
dc.identifier.doi10.18085/llas.6.1.123583644qq115t3
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.18085/llas.6.1.123583644qq115t3
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/44528
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Latino/Latin American Studies
dc.sourceUniversidad de Los Andes
dc.subjectPsychological intervention
dc.subjectDisengagement theory
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectMoral disengagement
dc.subjectSocial psychology
dc.titleReducing Moral Disengagement Mechanisms: A Comparison of Two Interventions
dc.typearticle

Files