Differential Item Functioning: Beyond validity evidence based on internal structure

dc.contributor.authorJuana Gómez‐Benito
dc.contributor.authorStephen G. Sireci
dc.contributor.authorJosé‐Luis Padilla
dc.contributor.authorMaría Dolores Hidalgo Montesinos
dc.contributor.authorIsabel Benítez
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T21:03:13Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T21:03:13Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 50
dc.description.abstractThe combination of quantitative and qualitative data within a mixed methods research perspective, along with planning DIF studies as validation studies, can help improve the validity of test score interpretations.
dc.identifier.doi10.7334/psicothema2017.183
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2017.183
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/85650
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCologio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado
dc.relation.ispartofPsicothema
dc.sourceUniversitat de Barcelona
dc.subjectDifferential item functioning
dc.subjectExternal validity
dc.subjectPerspective (graphical)
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectItem response theory
dc.subjectInternal validity
dc.subjectIncremental validity
dc.subjectTest (biology)
dc.subjectPsychometrics
dc.subjectTest validity
dc.titleDifferential Item Functioning: Beyond validity evidence based on internal structure
dc.typereview

Files