Inducción y contrastación en la teoría organizacional y el management

dc.contributor.authorAlexander Guzmán
dc.contributor.authorMaría Andrea Trujillo Dávila
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T17:02:37Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T17:02:37Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this article is to question the played role for the induction and falsification in the organizational theory and management discipline upholding the theory’s arguments done by Karl Popper, and connecting them with the process of the theory’s development since the administration’s point of view. It will analyze specifically the development of the Resource Dependence Theory by Pfeff er and Salancik at the end of the 70’s decade, and the problem of management fads exposed by Huczynski in 1993, giving evidence of the importance of the induction and falsification, through testing, in the construction of the administration’s theory. This article concludes what is happening about the theory’s development in the administration, and the possible present threats for the evolution and consolidation of the administration discipline.
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/61827
dc.language.isoes
dc.publisherLA Referencia
dc.relation.ispartofLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)
dc.sourceUniversidad de Los Andes
dc.subjectSociology
dc.subjectEpistemology
dc.subjectPolitical science
dc.subjectHumanities
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.titleInducción y contrastación en la teoría organizacional y el management
dc.typearticle

Files