Funding eligibility requirements: inclusion, exclusion, and mediation in peace interventions

dc.contributor.authorMarie Donna M. Ballesteros
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T15:13:38Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T15:13:38Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 4
dc.description.abstractThis article uses the case study of a network of NGOs involved in peace work in the Philippines to uncover the taken-for-granted reality of funding eligibility requirements – that they evade the question of who can strategically do peace work by defaulting to NGOs with the organisational structure to respond to donors’ accountability requirements, and that these requirements shape the relationships of NGOs on the ground. Theoretically seen as the global imposition of technocracy on the local, this study expands on existing knowledge by capturing the dynamics in a blurred global-local demarcation and by showing agency, thereby refuting the narrative of a technocratic straitjacket.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09614524.2020.1770700
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2020.1770700
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/51128
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relation.ispartofDevelopment in Practice
dc.sourceUniversidad Privada del Valle
dc.subjectTechnocracy
dc.subjectAccountability
dc.subjectMediation
dc.subjectInclusion (mineral)
dc.subjectWork (physics)
dc.subjectPublic administration
dc.subjectAgency (philosophy)
dc.subjectNarrative
dc.subjectPolitical science
dc.subjectSociology
dc.titleFunding eligibility requirements: inclusion, exclusion, and mediation in peace interventions
dc.typearticle

Files