Beyond the ‘east–west’ dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood.

dc.contributor.authorVivian L. Vignoles
dc.contributor.authorEllinor Owe
dc.contributor.authorMaja Becker
dc.contributor.authorPeter B. Smith
dc.contributor.authorMatthew J. Easterbrook
dc.contributor.authorRupert Brown
dc.contributor.authorRoberto González
dc.contributor.authorNicolás Didier
dc.contributor.authorDiego Carrasco
dc.contributor.authorMaría Paz Cadena
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T13:50:12Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T13:50:12Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 555
dc.description.abstractMarkus and Kitayama's (1991) theory of independent and interdependent self-construals had a major influence on social, personality, and developmental psychology by highlighting the role of culture in psychological processes. However, research has relied excessively on contrasts between North American and East Asian samples, and commonly used self-report measures of independence and interdependence frequently fail to show predicted cultural differences. We revisited the conceptualization and measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals in 2 large-scale multinational surveys, using improved methods for cross-cultural research. We developed (Study 1: N = 2924 students in 16 nations) and validated across cultures (Study 2: N = 7279 adults from 55 cultural groups in 33 nations) a new 7-dimensional model of self-reported ways of being independent or interdependent. Patterns of global variation support some of Markus and Kitayama's predictions, but a simple contrast between independence and interdependence does not adequately capture the diverse models of selfhood that prevail in different world regions. Cultural groups emphasize different ways of being both independent and interdependent, depending on individualism-collectivism, national socioeconomic development, and religious heritage. Our 7-dimensional model will allow future researchers to test more accurately the implications of cultural models of selfhood for psychological processes in diverse ecocultural contexts. (PsycINFO Database Record
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/xge0000175
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000175
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/43002
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Association
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Experimental Psychology General
dc.sourceUniversity of Sussex
dc.subjectVariation (astronomy)
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectCultural environment
dc.titleBeyond the ‘east–west’ dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood.
dc.typearticle

Files