The linkages between photosynthesis, productivity, growth and biomass in lowland Amazonian forests

dc.contributor.authorYadvinder Malhi
dc.contributor.authorChristopher E. Doughty
dc.contributor.authorGregory R. Goldsmith
dc.contributor.authorDaniel B. Metcalfe
dc.contributor.authorCécile Girardin
dc.contributor.authorToby R. Marthews
dc.contributor.authorJhon del Águila Pasquel
dc.contributor.authorLuiz E. O. C. Aragão
dc.contributor.authorAlejandro Araujo‐Murakami
dc.contributor.authorPaulo Brando
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T13:51:57Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T13:51:57Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 187
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding the relationship between photosynthesis, net primary productivity and growth in forest ecosystems is key to understanding how these ecosystems will respond to global anthropogenic change, yet the linkages among these components are rarely explored in detail. We provide the first comprehensive description of the productivity, respiration and carbon allocation of contrasting lowland Amazonian forests spanning gradients in seasonal water deficit and soil fertility. Using the largest data set assembled to date, ten sites in three countries all studied with a standardized methodology, we find that (i) gross primary productivity (GPP) has a simple relationship with seasonal water deficit, but that (ii) site-to-site variations in GPP have little power in explaining site-to-site spatial variations in net primary productivity (NPP) or growth because of concomitant changes in carbon use efficiency (CUE), and conversely, the woody growth rate of a tropical forest is a very poor proxy for its productivity. Moreover, (iii) spatial patterns of biomass are much more driven by patterns of residence times (i.e. tree mortality rates) than by spatial variation in productivity or tree growth. Current theory and models of tropical forest carbon cycling under projected scenarios of global atmospheric change can benefit from advancing beyond a focus on GPP. By improving our understanding of poorly understood processes such as CUE, NPP allocation and biomass turnover times, we can provide more complete and mechanistic approaches to linking climate and tropical forest carbon cycling.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/gcb.12859
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12859
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/43173
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofGlobal Change Biology
dc.sourceUniversity of Oxford
dc.subjectAmazonian
dc.subjectBiomass (ecology)
dc.subjectProductivity
dc.subjectPhotosynthesis
dc.subjectEnvironmental science
dc.subjectAgroforestry
dc.subjectAmazon rainforest
dc.subjectEcology
dc.subjectGeography
dc.subjectForestry
dc.titleThe linkages between photosynthesis, productivity, growth and biomass in lowland Amazonian forests
dc.typearticle

Files