Estimating species diversity and distribution in the era of <scp>B</scp>ig <scp>D</scp>ata: to what extent can we trust public databases?

dc.contributor.authorCarla Maldonado
dc.contributor.authorCarlos I. Molina
dc.contributor.authorAlexander Zizka
dc.contributor.authorClaes Persson
dc.contributor.authorCharlotte M. Taylor
dc.contributor.authorJoaquina Albán Castillo
dc.contributor.authorEder Chilquillo
dc.contributor.authorNina Rønsted
dc.contributor.authorAlexandre Antonelli
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T13:50:33Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T13:50:33Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 369
dc.description.abstractOpen databases and integrative bioinformatic tools allow a rapid approximation of large-scale patterns of biodiversity across space and altitudinal ranges. We found that geographic inaccuracy affects diversity patterns more than taxonomic uncertainties, often leading to false positives, i.e. overestimating species richness in relatively species poor regions. Public databases for species distribution are valuable and should be more explored, but under scrutiny and validation by taxonomic experts. We suggest that database managers implement easy ways of community feedback on data quality.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/geb.12326
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12326
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/43036
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofGlobal Ecology and Biogeography
dc.sourceUniversity of Copenhagen
dc.subjectDiversity (politics)
dc.subjectDistribution (mathematics)
dc.subjectEcology
dc.subjectDatabase
dc.subjectGeography
dc.subjectBiology
dc.titleEstimating species diversity and distribution in the era of <scp>B</scp>ig <scp>D</scp>ata: to what extent can we trust public databases?
dc.typearticle

Files