Beyond species means – the intraspecific contribution to global wood density variation
| dc.contributor.author | Fabian Jörg Fischer | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jérôme Chave | |
| dc.contributor.author | Amy Zanne | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tommaso Jucker | |
| dc.contributor.author | Alex Fajardo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Adeline Fayolle | |
| dc.contributor.author | Renato Augusto Ferreira de Lima | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ghislain Vieilledent | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hans Beeckman | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wannes Hubau | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Bolivia | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-22T14:27:47Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-22T14:27:47Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.description | Citaciones: 2 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Wood density is central for estimating vegetation carbon storage and a plant functional trait of great ecological and evolutionary importance. However, the global extent of wood density variation is unclear, especially at the intraspecific level. We assembled the most comprehensive wood density collection to date, including 109 626 records from 16 829 plant species across woody life forms and biomes (GWDD v.2, available here: doi: 10.5281/zenodo.16919509). Using the GWDD v.2, we explored the sources of wood density variation within individuals, within species and across environmental gradients. Intraspecific variation accounted for c. 15% of overall wood density variation (SD = 0.068 g cm<sup>-3</sup>). Variance was 50% smaller in sapwood than heartwood, and 30% smaller in branchwood than trunkwood. Individuals in extreme environments (dry, hot and acidic soils) had higher wood density than conspecifics elsewhere (+0.02 g cm<sup>-3</sup>, c. 4% of the mean). Intraspecific environmental effects strongly tracked interspecific patterns (r = 0.83) but were 70-80% smaller and varied considerably among taxa. Individual plant wood density was difficult to predict (root mean square error > 0.08 g cm<sup>-3</sup>; single-measurement R<sup>2</sup> = 0.59). We recommend: (1) systematic sampling of multiple individuals and tissues for local applications; and (2) expanded taxonomic coverage combined with integrative models for robust estimates across ecological scales. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/nph.70860 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70860 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/46654 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Wiley | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | New Phytologist | |
| dc.source | Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique | |
| dc.subject | Intraspecific competition | |
| dc.subject | Biome | |
| dc.subject | Interspecific competition | |
| dc.subject | Ecology | |
| dc.subject | Biology | |
| dc.subject | Density dependence | |
| dc.subject | Trait | |
| dc.subject | Variation (astronomy) | |
| dc.subject | Vegetation (pathology) | |
| dc.subject | Herbivore | |
| dc.title | Beyond species means – the intraspecific contribution to global wood density variation | |
| dc.type | article |