Comment on “The global tree restoration potential”

dc.contributor.authorJoseph W. Veldman
dc.contributor.authorJulie C. Aleman
dc.contributor.authorSwanni T. Alvarado
dc.contributor.authorT. Michael Anderson
dc.contributor.authorSally Archibald
dc.contributor.authorWilliam J. Bond
dc.contributor.authorThomas W. Boutton
dc.contributor.authorNina Buchmann
dc.contributor.authorÉlise Buisson
dc.contributor.authorJosep G. Canadell
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T21:15:00Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T21:15:00Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 338
dc.description.abstractBastin <i>et al</i> (Reports, 5 July 2019, p. 76) claim that 205 gigatonnes of carbon can be globally sequestered by restoring 0.9 billion hectares of forest and woodland canopy cover. Reinterpreting the data from Bastin <i>et al</i>, we show that the global land area actually required to sequester human-emitted CO<sub>2</sub> is at least a factor of 3 higher, representing an unrealistically large area.
dc.identifier.doi10.1126/science.aay7976
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay7976
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/86822
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science
dc.relation.ispartofScience
dc.sourceTexas A&M University
dc.subjectTree (set theory)
dc.subjectEnvironmental science
dc.titleComment on “The global tree restoration potential”
dc.typeletter

Files