La producción de la prueba arbitral: las Reglas de la IBA v/s las Reglas de Praga

dc.contributor.authorJuan Figueroa Valdés
dc.contributor.authorJuan Figueroa Guzmán
dc.contributor.authorJonine D. Figueroa
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T18:42:57Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T18:42:57Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractIn this article we refer to the evidence in international arbitration, doing a parallel between the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration – better known as the IBA Rules– and the Rules on the Efficient Conduct of Proceeding in International Commercial Arbitration – colloquially known as the Prague Rules–, in relation to the production of documents, fact witness and expert evidence, especially highlighting the different approach between both guides.
dc.identifier.doi10.36649/rea1102
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.36649/rea1102
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/71760
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Ecuatoriana de Arbitraje
dc.sourceUniversidad de Los Andes, Chile
dc.subjectArbitration
dc.subjectWitness
dc.subjectExpert witness
dc.subjectRelation (database)
dc.subjectPolitical science
dc.titleLa producción de la prueba arbitral: las Reglas de la IBA v/s las Reglas de Praga
dc.typearticle

Files