Microclimate Data Improve Predictions of Insect Abundance Models Based on Calibrated Spatiotemporal Temperatures

dc.contributor.authorFrançois Rebaudo
dc.contributor.authorÉmile Faye
dc.contributor.authorOlivier Dangles
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T14:06:18Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T14:06:18Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 55
dc.description.abstractA large body of literature has recently recognized the role of microclimates in controlling the physiology and ecology of species, yet the relevance of fine-scale climatic data for modeling species performance and distribution remains a matter of debate. Using a 6-year monitoring of three potato moth species, major crop pests in the tropical Andes, we asked whether the spatiotemporal resolution of temperature data affect the predictions of models of moth performance and distribution. For this, we used three different climatic data sets: (i) the WorldClim dataset (global dataset), (ii) air temperature recorded using data loggers (weather station dataset), and (iii) air crop canopy temperature (microclimate dataset). We developed a statistical procedure to calibrate all datasets to monthly and yearly variation in temperatures, while keeping both spatial and temporal variances (air monthly temperature at 1 km² for the WorldClim dataset, air hourly temperature for the weather station, and air minute temperature over 250 m radius disks for the microclimate dataset). Then, we computed pest performances based on these three datasets. Results for temperature ranging from 9 to 11°C revealed discrepancies in the simulation outputs in both survival and development rates depending on the spatiotemporal resolution of the temperature dataset. Temperature and simulated pest performances were then combined into multiple linear regression models to compare predicted vs. field data. We used an additional set of study sites to test the ability of the results of our model to be extrapolated over larger scales. Results showed that the model implemented with microclimatic data best predicted observed pest abundances for our study sites, but was less accurate than the global dataset model when performed at larger scales. Our simulations therefore stress the importance to consider different temperature datasets depending on the issue to be solved in order to accurately predict species abundances. In conclusion, keeping in mind that the mismatch between the size of organisms and the scale at which climate data are collected and modeled remains a key issue, temperature dataset selection should be balanced by the desired output spatiotemporal scale for better predicting pest dynamics and developing efficient pest management strategies.
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fphys.2016.00139
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00139
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/44566
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFrontiers Media
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Physiology
dc.sourceHigher University of San Andrés
dc.subjectMicroclimate
dc.subjectEnvironmental science
dc.subjectPEST analysis
dc.subjectAir temperature
dc.subjectWeather station
dc.subjectAbundance (ecology)
dc.subjectCanopy
dc.subjectAtmospheric sciences
dc.subjectSpecies distribution
dc.subjectSpatial distribution
dc.titleMicroclimate Data Improve Predictions of Insect Abundance Models Based on Calibrated Spatiotemporal Temperatures
dc.typearticle

Files