Comparison between a high‐resolution single‐stage Orbitrap and a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer for quantitative analyses of drugs

dc.contributor.authorHugues Henry
dc.contributor.authorHamid Reza Sobhi
dc.contributor.authorOlaf Scheibner
dc.contributor.authorMaciej Bromirski
dc.contributor.authorSubodh Nimkar
dc.contributor.authorBertrand Rochat
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T13:53:17Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T13:53:17Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 131
dc.description.abstractThe capabilities of a high-resolution (HR), accurate mass spectrometer (Exactive-MS) operating in full scan MS mode was investigated for the quantitative LC/MS analysis of drugs in patients' plasma samples. A mass resolution of 50,000 (FWHM) at m/z 200 and a mass extracted window of 5 ppm around the theoretical m/z of each analyte were used to construct chromatograms for quantitation. The quantitative performance of the Exactive-MS was compared with that of a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (TQ-MS), TSQ Quantum Discovery or Quantum Ultra, operating in the conventional selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode. The study consisted of 17 therapeutic drugs including 8 antifungal agents (anidulafungin, caspofungin, fluconazole, itraconazole, hydroxyitraconazole posaconazole, voriconazole and voriconazole-N-oxide), 4 immunosuppressants (ciclosporine, everolimus, sirolimus and tacrolimus) and 5 protein kinase inhibitors (dasatinib, imatinib, nilotinib, sorafenib and sunitinib). The quantitative results obtained with HR-MS acquisition show comparable detection specificity, assay precision, accuracy, linearity and sensitivity to SRM acquisition. Importantly, HR-MS offers several benefits over TQ-MS technology: absence of SRM optimization, time saving when changing the analysis from one MS to another, more complete information of what is in the samples and easier troubleshooting. Our work demonstrates that U/HPLC coupled to Exactive HR-MS delivers comparable results to TQ-MS in routine quantitative drug analyses. Considering the advantages of HR-MS, these results suggest that, in the near future, there should be a shift in how routine quantitative analyses of small molecules, particularly for therapeutic drugs, are performed.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/rcm.6121
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.6121
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/43303
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
dc.sourceUniversity of Lausanne
dc.subjectChemistry
dc.subjectTriple quadrupole mass spectrometer
dc.subjectMass spectrometry
dc.subjectChromatography
dc.subjectOrbitrap
dc.subjectTherapeutic drug monitoring
dc.subjectSelected reaction monitoring
dc.subjectQuantitative analysis (chemistry)
dc.subjectAnalyte
dc.titleComparison between a high‐resolution single‐stage Orbitrap and a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer for quantitative analyses of drugs
dc.typearticle

Files