Abstract 4142748: Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Aspirin for Secondary Stroke Prevention in Patients with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
| dc.contributor.author | Juan Armando Talavera | |
| dc.contributor.author | Larissa Teixeira | |
| dc.contributor.author | Thomaz Alexandre Costa | |
| dc.contributor.author | Denilsa Navalha | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tathiane Gibicoski | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nicole Fernandez | |
| dc.contributor.author | Luciana Armaganijan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Guilherme Dagostin de Carvalho | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Bolivia | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-22T19:25:39Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-22T19:25:39Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) represents approximately 20% of ischemic strokes. The optimal treatment strategy for secondary prevention remains uncertain for patients with ESUS. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus aspirin therapy in patients with a history of ESUS. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of science databases were systematically searched for eligible trials until March 2024. The primary outcome of interest was recurrent stroke. Major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) were assessed as safety outcomes. We pooled hazard rations (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for analysis. Results: Four RCTs comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus aspirin were included comprising 13,970 patients, of whom 6,989 (50%) were randomized to the DOACs group. The mean follow-up was 16 months. Compared to aspirin, DOACs did not reduce the incidence of recurrent stroke (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.81-1.09; p=0.44), ischemic stroke (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.79-1.06; p=0.23), all-cause mortality (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.87-1.42; p=0.40), and major bleeding (HR: 1.56; 95% CI: 0.85%-2.86; p=0.15). However, patients in the DOACs group presented significantly higher incidence of CRNMB (HR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.23-1.92; p=0.0002) when compared with the aspirin group. Conclusion: Compared with aspirin, DOACs use was associated with an elevated risk of CRNMB and did not demonstrate superior efficacy in preventing recurrent stroke among patients with ESUS. <div class="acfifjfajpekbmhmjppnmmjgmhjkildl" id="acfifjfajpekbmhmjppnmmjgmhjkildl"> </div> <div class="acfifjfajpekbmhmjppnmmjgmhjkildl" id="acfifjfajpekbmhmjppnmmjgmhjkildl"> </div> | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4142748 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4142748 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/75989 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Circulation | |
| dc.source | Mount Sinai Medical Center | |
| dc.subject | Medicine | |
| dc.subject | Aspirin | |
| dc.subject | Stroke (engine) | |
| dc.subject | Meta-analysis | |
| dc.subject | Randomized controlled trial | |
| dc.subject | Embolic stroke | |
| dc.subject | Internal medicine | |
| dc.subject | Secondary prevention | |
| dc.subject | Cardiology | |
| dc.subject | Intensive care medicine | |
| dc.title | Abstract 4142748: Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Aspirin for Secondary Stroke Prevention in Patients with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. | |
| dc.type | article |