AMA-NEGATIVE PRIMARY BILIARY CHOLANGITIS IN LATIN AMERICA: A DISTINCT SUBSET WITH LOWER TREATMENT RESPONSE

dc.contributor.authorCláudia Alves Couto
dc.contributor.authorGuilherme Grossi Lopes Cançado
dc.contributor.authorMaria Lúcia Gomes Ferraz
dc.contributor.authorDébora Raquel Benedita Terrabuio
dc.contributor.authorAlejandra Villamil
dc.contributor.authorLorena Castro Solari
dc.contributor.authorGraciela Castro‐Narro
dc.contributor.authorEzequiel Ridruejo
dc.contributor.authorCristiane Alves Villela‐Nogueira
dc.contributor.authorD. Guerrero
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T19:45:32Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T19:45:32Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractPrimary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an autoimmune cholestatic disease, typically diagnosed by the presence of anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA). Whether AMA-negative PBC represents a distinct clinical phenotype remains controversial. This study aimed to characterize the epidemiological profile of PBC according to AMA status in Latin America. This ongoing, retrospective, international multicenter cohort study, sponsored by ALEH, includes PBC patients from multiple Latin American countries. Patients were stratified by AMA status; those with autoimmune hepatitis-PBC overlap were excluded. Data from 1,204 patients were analyzed: Brazil (48.3%), Argentina (23.4%), Chile (10.8%), Mexico (7.4%), and others. Most were female (92.3%) with a mean age at diagnosis of 53±13 years; 22.2% had cirrhosis at baseline. Overlap syndrome was excluded. AMA were positive in 76.8%. AMA-positive and AMA-negative patients had similar rates of female sex (92.5% each, p=0.963), baseline cirrhosis (22.4% vs. 23.6%, p=0.706), and symptomatic presentation (77.5% vs. 79.4%, p=0.544). MASLD was more frequent among AMA-negative patients (7.5% vs. 3.8%, p=0.024), which also had higher rates of sp100 (9.1% vs 2.5%, p< 0.001) and gp210 (7.3 vs 3.3%, p< 0.001) positivity. Treatment with UDCA was performed in 95.2% of patients and, from those, 28.3% had second line treatment indicated due to incomplete response to UDCA. AMA-positive patients showed higher response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) at 12 months, including ALP normalization (29.7% vs. 21.2%, p=0.035) and deep response (17.5% vs. 8.6%, p=0.007). Similar findings were observed after 12 months of fibrate therapy (34.8% vs. 9.4%, p=0.005). No difference was found in transplant-free survival (p=0.213). AMA-negative PBC patients in Latin America present similar baseline features but have lower response rates to UDCA and fibrates, supporting the hypothesis of a biologically distinct disease subset.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aohep.2025.102013
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.aohep.2025.102013
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/77945
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Hepatology
dc.sourceHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectUrsodeoxycholic acid
dc.subjectPrimary biliary cirrhosis
dc.subjectInternal medicine
dc.subjectGastroenterology
dc.subjectCohort
dc.subjectCirrhosis
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectAutoantibody
dc.subjectLatin Americans
dc.titleAMA-NEGATIVE PRIMARY BILIARY CHOLANGITIS IN LATIN AMERICA: A DISTINCT SUBSET WITH LOWER TREATMENT RESPONSE
dc.typearticle

Files