Mapping landscape scale variations of forest structure, biomass, and productivity in Amazonia

dc.contributor.authorSassan Saatchi
dc.contributor.authorYadvinder Malhi
dc.contributor.authorBrian R. Zutta
dc.contributor.authorWolfgang Buermann
dc.contributor.authorLiana O. Anderson
dc.contributor.authorAlejandro Araújo
dc.contributor.authorOliver L. Phillips
dc.contributor.authorJ. Peacock
dc.contributor.authorHans ter Steege
dc.contributor.authorG. Lopez Gonzalez
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T14:43:44Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T14:43:44Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 28
dc.description.abstractAbstract. Landscape and environmental variables such as topography, geomorphology, soil types, and climate are important factors affecting forest composition, structure, productivity, and biomass. Here, we combine a network of forest inventories with recently developed global data products from satellite observations in modeling the potential distributions of forest structure and productivity in Amazonia and examine how geomorphology, soil, and precipitation control these distributions. We use the RAINFOR network of forest plots distributed in lowland forests across Amazonia, and satellite observations of tree cover, leaf area index, phenology, moisture, and topographical variations. A maximum entropy estimation (Maxent) model is employed to predict the spatial distribution of several key forest structure parameters: basal area, fraction of large trees, fraction of palms, wood density, productivity, and above-ground biomass at 5 km spatial resolution. A series of statistical tests at selected thresholds as well as across all thresholds and jackknife analysis are used to examine the accuracy of distribution maps and the relative contributions of environmental variables. The final maps were interpreted using soil, precipitation, and geomorphological features of Amazonia and it was found that the length of dry season played a key role in impacting the distribution of all forest variables except the wood density. Soil type had a significant impact on the wood productivity. Most high productivity forests were distributed either on less infertile soils of western Amazonia and Andean foothills, on crystalline shields, and younger alluvial deposits. Areas of low elevation and high density of small rivers of Central Amazonia showed distinct features, hosting mainly forests with low productivity and smaller trees.
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/bgd-6-5461-2009
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-6-5461-2009
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/48201
dc.language.isoen
dc.sourceJet Propulsion Laboratory
dc.subjectEnvironmental science
dc.subjectAmazon rainforest
dc.subjectBasal area
dc.subjectPhysical geography
dc.subjectBiomass (ecology)
dc.subjectSpatial distribution
dc.subjectProductivity
dc.subjectHydrology (agriculture)
dc.subjectGeography
dc.subjectEcology
dc.titleMapping landscape scale variations of forest structure, biomass, and productivity in Amazonia
dc.typearticle

Files