EL LUGAR DE LA DECOLONIALIDAD EN EL CAMPO COMUNICACIONAL LATINOAMERICANO
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Punto Cero
Abstract
Resumen: El artículo se pregunta por el lugar que ocupa la decolonialidad en la estructura del campo comunicacional y, para establecerlo, desarrolla una topología basada en la teoría de los campos y la sociología de la práctica de Pierre Bourdieu. En ese marco, compara los alcances de las nociones inglesa de "field" y francesa de "champ" y hace un breve recuento de los usos del concepto de "campo" en bibliografía especializada de referencia. Posteriormente, presenta una síntesis de las herramientas conceptuales pertinentes para proponer un análisis topológico que, inmediatamente después, describe los diferentes componentes identificados, sus jerarquías, posiciones e interrelaciones. Por último, plantea que la Comunicación decolonial representa un factor relevante para la posible redefinición del campo examinado.
Abstract: The article questions the place that decoloniality has in the structure of the communicational field, and to establish it this article develops a topology based on Pierre Bourdieu's field theory and sociology of practice. In this framework, it compares the scope of the English notions of "field" and the French of "champ" and makes a brief account of the uses of the concept of "campo" in specialized reference bibliography. Subsequently, it presents a synthesis of the pertinent conceptual tools in order to propose a topological analysis that, immediately afterwards, describes the different components identified, their hierarchies, positions and interrelationships. Finally, it poses that decolonial communication represents a relevant factor for the possible redefinition of the examined field.
Abstract: The article questions the place that decoloniality has in the structure of the communicational field, and to establish it this article develops a topology based on Pierre Bourdieu's field theory and sociology of practice. In this framework, it compares the scope of the English notions of "field" and the French of "champ" and makes a brief account of the uses of the concept of "campo" in specialized reference bibliography. Subsequently, it presents a synthesis of the pertinent conceptual tools in order to propose a topological analysis that, immediately afterwards, describes the different components identified, their hierarchies, positions and interrelationships. Finally, it poses that decolonial communication represents a relevant factor for the possible redefinition of the examined field.
Description
Vol. 27, No. 44