Cucullanus pinnai pinnai and C. pinnai pterodorasi (Nematoda Cucullanidae): what does the integrative taxonomy tell us about these species and subspecies classification?

dc.contributor.authorAilán-Choke, Lorena G
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Dora
dc.contributor.authorMalta, Lennon S
dc.contributor.authorCouto, João Victor
dc.contributor.authorTavares, Luiz Eduardo R
dc.contributor.authorLuque, José L
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Felipe B
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-24T15:03:27Z
dc.date.available2026-03-24T15:03:27Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.descriptionVol. 122, No. 2, pp. 557-569
dc.description.abstractCucullanus pinnai has been divided in two subspecies (C. pinnai pinnai and C. pinnai pterodorasi) based on the morphology of oesophastome. While C. pinnai pinnai apparently shows low host specificity and broad geographic occurrence, with certain morphological variations, C. pinnai pterodorasi was reported once, parasitizing Pterodoras granulosus. We used an integrative taxonomic approach to evaluate whether or not populations of C. pinnai pinnai from Trychomycterus spegazzinii (Escoipe River, Argentina) and Pimelodus fur (Miranda River, Brazil), and of C. pinnai pterodorasi from Pterodoras granulosus (Miranda River, Brazil) are conspecific. Parasites were observed using light microscopy and genetically characterized based on partial sequences of the 18S and 28S rDNA, ITS1-5.8S-ITS2, and COI mtDNA. Phylogenies were reconstructed and the Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent (GMYC), Poisson Tree Process (bPTP), and Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD) were used for species delimitation purposes. The present samples formed well-supported monophyletic assemblages, corroborating in part the results of morphological analyses; however, they grouped according to geographic origin. Species delimitation suggested conspecificity of C. pinnai pinnai with C. pinnai pterodorasi from Brazil; consequently, the morphology of oesophastome may be an intraspecific variation. Results also indicated that C. pinnai may represent a species complex as samples from Argentina were suggestive of an independent specific entity. However, definitive affirmations are premature, since there is no autapomorphy for separating C. pinnai from Brazil and Argentina and sampling was limited to three host species from two river basins. The phylogenetic reconstructions also confirmed the artificiality of some genera within Cucullanidae.eng
dc.description.sponsorshipConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas Y Técnicas (CONICET), Instituto Para El Estudio de La Biodiversidad de Invertebrados, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Salta, Av. Bolivia 5150, 4400, Salta, Argentina. | Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas Y Técnicas (CONICET), Instituto Para El Estudio de La Biodiversidad de Invertebrados, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Salta, Av. Bolivia 5150, 4400, Salta, Argentina. | Programa de Pós-Gr
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00436-022-07758-3
dc.identifier.issn1432-1955
dc.identifier.otherPMID:36526926
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-022-07758-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/100948
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofParasitology research
dc.sourcePubMed
dc.subjectDoradidae
dc.subjectGenetic characterization
dc.subjectHelminth
dc.subjectIntegrative taxonomy
dc.subjectMorphology
dc.subjectNematoda
dc.subjectPimelodidae
dc.subjectSiluriformes
dc.subjectTrichomycteridae
dc.titleCucullanus pinnai pinnai and C. pinnai pterodorasi (Nematoda Cucullanidae): what does the integrative taxonomy tell us about these species and subspecies classification?
dc.typeArtículo Científico Publicado

Files