Continuous and binary sets of responses are not the same: Evidence from the field

dc.contributor.authorNoelia Rivera‐Garrido
dc.contributor.authorMaría del Pino Ramos-Sosa
dc.contributor.authorMichela Accerenzi
dc.contributor.authorPablo Brañas‐Garza
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T20:47:19Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T20:47:19Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractThis paper conducts a pre-registered study aimed to compare binary and continuous set of responses in questionnaires. Binary responses consist of two possible opposed responses (Yes/No). Continuous are numerical, where respondents can indicate an answer in a 0 to 10 horizontal blind line. We study whether binary and continuous feasible sets of responses yield to thesame outcome (distribution) and the same cost (duration in minutes). We collect data from 360 households in Honduras who were randomly assigned to Yes/No questions or given a slider (visual scaling 0-10) to mark their responses, therefore, we provide causal evidence. We find that respondents are 13% more likely to say “Yes” and spend 2.1 minutes less in the binary setting. Besides, we find that most of the differences between binary and continuous settings arise from questions which include negative wording.
dc.identifier.doi10.31234/osf.io/pb57v
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/pb57v
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/84072
dc.language.isoen
dc.sourceUniversidad Loyola Andalucía
dc.subjectBinary number
dc.subjectSet (abstract data type)
dc.subjectOutcome (game theory)
dc.subjectScaling
dc.subjectStatistics
dc.subjectField (mathematics)
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectEconometrics
dc.subjectMathematics
dc.subjectComputer science
dc.titleContinuous and binary sets of responses are not the same: Evidence from the field
dc.typepreprint

Files