Actuar o no actuar: un análisis comparativo del rol de los estados de Chiapas y Arizona

dc.contributor.authorEduardo Torre Cantalapiedra
dc.contributor.authorJorge A. Schiavon
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T15:15:54Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T15:15:54Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 3
dc.description.abstractSetting immigration policy is reserved for the federal government in both Mexico and the United States. However, de facto, the states in both countries carry out certain immigration policies. Chiapas and Arizona have both faced challenges in this area. The government of Arizona has followed an anti-immigrant logic, while the government of Chiapas has focused on the defense of migrants’ human rights. The aim of this article is to understand the practically opposite roles played by these two states in managing immigration.
dc.identifier.doi10.20999/nam.2016.a006
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.20999/nam.2016.a006
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/51351
dc.language.isoes
dc.publisherNational Autonomous University of Mexico
dc.relation.ispartofNorteamérica
dc.sourceCollege of Mexico
dc.subjectPolitical science
dc.subjectImmigration
dc.subjectImmigration policy
dc.subjectDe facto
dc.subjectGeography
dc.titleActuar o no actuar: un análisis comparativo del rol de los estados de Chiapas y Arizona
dc.typearticle

Files