Assessing textual source code comparison: split or unified?
| dc.contributor.author | Alejandra Cossio Chavalier | |
| dc.contributor.author | Juan Pablo Sandoval Alcocer | |
| dc.contributor.author | Alexandre Bergel | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Bolivia | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-22T16:21:34Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-22T16:21:34Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.description | Citaciones: 1 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Evaluating source code differences is an important task in software engineering. Unified and split are two popular textual representations supported by clients for source code management. Whether these representations differ in supporting source code commit assessment is still unknown, despite its ubiquity in software production environments. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1145/3397537.3398471 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1145/3397537.3398471 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/57772 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.source | Universidad Católica Bolivia San Pablo | |
| dc.subject | Commit | |
| dc.subject | Computer science | |
| dc.subject | Source code | |
| dc.subject | Code (set theory) | |
| dc.subject | KPI-driven code analysis | |
| dc.subject | Task (project management) | |
| dc.subject | Static program analysis | |
| dc.subject | Code review | |
| dc.subject | Programming language | |
| dc.subject | Software | |
| dc.title | Assessing textual source code comparison: split or unified? | |
| dc.type | article |