The Weakness of Tie Strength

dc.contributor.authorMatthew E. Brashears
dc.contributor.authorEric Quintane
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T16:16:05Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T16:16:05Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 1
dc.description.abstractMark Granovetter revolutionized social science with the argument that “weak” ties provide more novel content than “strong” ties, but left the definition of tie strength relatively ambiguous. The result has been serious issues of conceptualization and operationalization in the subsequent literature. This paper addresses these issues by presenting a classification system for social relations that improves upon the concept of tie strength. We unpack Granovetter’s original argument, and subsequent scholarship, to identify three factors that govern the transmission behavior of network ties: capacity (the ability of a tie to transmit content), frequency (the average time between tie activations), and redundancy (the extent to which a tie reaches persons who are connected to each other). Empirical analyses and simulation models identify existing types of ties and reveal new, and currently understudied, relationship types, supporting the usefulness of our new Multidimensional Index of Network Ties (MINT) classification system.
dc.identifier.doi10.5465/ambpp.2016.10172abstract
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2016.10172abstract
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/57229
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAcademy of Management
dc.relation.ispartofAcademy of Management Proceedings
dc.sourceUniversidad de Los Andes
dc.subjectOperationalization
dc.subjectConceptualization
dc.subjectArgument (complex analysis)
dc.subjectInterpersonal ties
dc.subjectRedundancy (engineering)
dc.subjectSociology
dc.subjectComputer science
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.titleThe Weakness of Tie Strength
dc.typearticle

Files