NeuroRight to Equal Access to Mental Augmentation

dc.contributor.authorDiego Borbón
dc.contributor.authorLuisa Borbón
dc.contributor.authorMaría Alejandra Bustamante
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T14:51:54Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T14:51:54Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 9
dc.description.abstractThis paper addresses the different discussions that led to the creation of the NeuroRights Initiative and the proposal for a NeuroRight to equal access to mental augmentation. Then it presents some conceptual clarifications, and subsequently makes a detailed analysis of the proposal in light of posthumanism. In this sense, it studies how this NeuroRight may lead to inequality, loss of social diversity and pressures on sociocultural and religious diversity. It also studies the problems and challenges inherent to the implementation of this type of initiative. We propose that a NeuroRight to enhancement should not be incorporated and that equitable access to technologies should be limited to therapeutic purposes only.
dc.identifier.doi10.14422/rib.i16.y2021.006
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14422/rib.i16.y2021.006
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/48998
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherComillas Pontifical University
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Iberoamericana de Bioética
dc.sourceUniversidad Externado de Colombia
dc.subjectDiversity (politics)
dc.subjectSociocultural evolution
dc.subjectPosthumanism
dc.subjectSociology
dc.subjectInequality
dc.subjectComputer science
dc.subjectMental model
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.titleNeuroRight to Equal Access to Mental Augmentation
dc.typearticle

Files