Co-management of National Protected Areas: Lessons Learned From Bolivia

Abstract

This article evaluates local management committees and co‐administration—two mechanisms to promote local participation in the management of Bolivia's protected areas. The experience with the broadly participatory management committees varied tremendously. While their potential utility was large, they often struggled to overcome conflicts between local stakeholders, inconsistent representation, and a lack of basic funding for their operations. Co-administered protected areas were significantly better managed than those that were not, particularly for basic protection activities. Differences in long-term management, financing, and participation were not significant. Key challenges to co-administered protected areas included unclear rights and responsibilities of the parties, poor communication, distrust, and other institutional weaknesses. We conclude that co-administration works best when both parties have clearly defined rights and responsibilities, engage as full partners, are committed to protected area objectives, develop adequate institutional capacity, and build mutual trust and local support through effective communication and complimentary mechanisms to foster broad participation.