Treatment of Bolivian Mucosal Leishmaniasis with Miltefosine

dc.contributor.authorJaime Soto
dc.contributor.authorJulia Toledo
dc.contributor.authorL Valda
dc.contributor.authorMargarita Balderrama
dc.contributor.authorIrene Maeve Rea
dc.contributor.authorRolando Sergio Llópiz Parra
dc.contributor.authorJ Herrera Ardiles
dc.contributor.authorPaula Soto
dc.contributor.authorÁngel Herrera‐Gómez
dc.contributor.authorF. Molleda
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T13:52:59Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T13:52:59Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 136
dc.description.abstractIn this unrandomized trial, oral miltefosine was at least as effective as heroic doses of parenteral amphotericin B. The cure rate for miltefosine was approximately equivalent to historical cure rates using parenteral pentavalent antimony for mild and extensive disease in neighboring Peru. Although gastrointestinal side reactions do occur with miltefosine, its toxicity profile is superior to that of antimony and far superior to that of amphotericin B--in part because of the inherent attractiveness of oral versus parenteral agents. Our results suggest that miltefosine should be the treatment of choice for mucosal disease in North and South America.
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/510588
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1086/510588
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/43275
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Infectious Diseases
dc.sourceHospital de Clínicas
dc.subjectMiltefosine
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectAmphotericin B
dc.subjectLeishmaniasis
dc.subjectGastroenterology
dc.subjectVisceral leishmaniasis
dc.subjectInternal medicine
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.subjectDermatology
dc.titleTreatment of Bolivian Mucosal Leishmaniasis with Miltefosine
dc.typearticle

Files