Assessing conservation priorities of endemic freshwater fishes in the Tropical Andes region

dc.contributor.authorMarcelo F. Tognelli
dc.contributor.authorElizabeth P. Anderson
dc.contributor.authorLuz F. Jiménez‐Segura
dc.contributor.authorJunior Chuctaya
dc.contributor.authorLuisa Chocano
dc.contributor.authorJavier A. Maldonado‐Ocampo
dc.contributor.authorLina Mesa‐Salazar
dc.contributor.authorJosé Iván Mojica
dc.contributor.authorFernando M. Carvajal‐Vallejos
dc.contributor.authorVanessa de Almeida Ferreira Corrêa
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T14:10:10Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T14:10:10Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 38
dc.description.abstractAbstract Assessing the effectiveness of protected areas for sustaining species and identifying priority sites for their conservation is vital for decision making, particularly for freshwater fishes in South America, the global centre of freshwater fish diversity. Several conservation planning studies have used threatened freshwater fishes or species that are vulnerable to climate change as conservation targets, but none has included both in priority‐setting analysis. The objectives of this study were to identify gaps in the coverage of the existing protected areas in representing the endemic freshwater fishes of the Tropical Andes region, and to identify conservation priority areas that adequately cover threatened species and species vulnerable to climate change. Data on 648 freshwater fishes from the Tropical Andes were used to identify gaps in the protected area coverage, and to identify conservation priority sites under three scenarios: (i) prioritize threatened species; (ii) prioritize species that are vulnerable to climate change; and (iii) prioritize both threatened species and species vulnerable to climate change. A total of 571 species (88% of all species) were not covered by any protected areas; most of them are restricted to ≤10 catchments. To represent both threatened species and species vulnerable to climate change in the third scenario, 635 catchments were identified as priority areas, representing 26.5% of the study area. The number of irreplaceable catchments for this scenario is 475, corresponding to 22.5% of the total area. The results of this study could be crucial for designing strategies for the effective protection of native fish populations in the Tropical Andes, and for planning proactive climate adaptation. It is hoped that the identification of priority areas, particularly irreplaceable catchments, will help to guide conservation and management decisions in the Andean region.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/aqc.2971
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2971
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/44941
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofAquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
dc.sourceInternational Union for Conservation of Nature
dc.subjectThreatened species
dc.subjectFreshwater fish
dc.subjectGeography
dc.subjectClimate change
dc.subjectEndemism
dc.subjectEcology
dc.subjectConservation status
dc.subjectNear-threatened species
dc.subjectBiodiversity
dc.titleAssessing conservation priorities of endemic freshwater fishes in the Tropical Andes region
dc.typearticle

Files